Panasonic LF1 vs Samsung TL350
92 Imaging
37 Features
55 Overall
44
94 Imaging
33 Features
47 Overall
38
Panasonic LF1 vs Samsung TL350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400 (Raise to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-200mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
- 192g - 103 x 62 x 28mm
- Launched November 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.4-5.8) lens
- 195g - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Released February 2010
- Alternate Name is WB2000
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Panasonic LF1 vs Samsung TL350 Overview
Here is a in depth comparison of the Panasonic LF1 versus Samsung TL350, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by companies Panasonic and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the LF1 (12MP) and the TL350 (10MP) is pretty similar but the LF1 (1/1.7") and TL350 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe LF1 was released 3 years later than the TL350 and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick summation of how the LF1 grades against the TL350 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Panasonic LF1 vs Samsung TL350 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Panasonic Lumix DMC-LF1 and Samsung TL350. The complete galleries are available at Panasonic LF1 Gallery and Samsung TL350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic LF1 over the Samsung TL350
| LF1 | TL350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | November 2013 |  | February 2010 | Fresher by 46 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL350 over the Panasonic LF1
| TL350 | LF1 |
|---|
Common features in the Panasonic LF1 and Samsung TL350
| LF1 | TL350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen dimensions |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 920k | The same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | No Touch screen |
Panasonic LF1 vs Samsung TL350 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry your camera regularly, you will have to consider its weight and proportions. The Panasonic LF1 has outer measurements of 103mm x 62mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL350 has measurements of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs).
Take a look at the Panasonic LF1 versus Samsung TL350 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the LF1 and the TL350.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the LF1 and TL350 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Panasonic LF1 vs Samsung TL350 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to envision the contrast between sensor sizing simply by reviewing specifications. The photograph underneath should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the LF1 and TL350.
Plainly, both of those cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The LF1 due to its bigger sensor will make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Panasonic LF1 will deliver extra detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will let you crop shots much more aggressively. The fresher LF1 will have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Panasonic LF1 vs Samsung TL350 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Panasonic LF1 vs Samsung TL350 Specifications
| Panasonic Lumix DMC-LF1 | Samsung TL350 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Panasonic | Samsung |
| Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-LF1 | Samsung TL350 |
| Other name | - | WB2000 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2013-11-26 | 2010-02-20 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 23 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-200mm (7.1x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-5.9 | f/2.4-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 920k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 16 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m | 5.20 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 608 x 342 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 138 x 78 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 192 gr (0.42 lbs) | 195 gr (0.43 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 103 x 62 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 52 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.8 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.6 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 211 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 photographs | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | - | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $500 | $400 |