Panasonic SZ3 vs Samsung TL350
96 Imaging
40 Features
29 Overall
35
![Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ3 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ3 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-SZ3/Panasonic-SZ3-front.jpg)
![Samsung TL350 front Samsung TL350 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Samsung-TL350/Samsung-TL350-front.jpg)
94 Imaging
33 Features
47 Overall
38
Panasonic SZ3 vs Samsung TL350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-250mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 126g - 95 x 56 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.4-5.8) lens
- 195g - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Launched February 2010
- Other Name is WB2000
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Panasonic SZ3 vs Samsung TL350 Overview
Below, we are comparing the Panasonic SZ3 vs Samsung TL350, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers Panasonic and Samsung. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the SZ3 (16MP) and TL350 (10MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
The SZ3 was manufactured 2 years after the TL350 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a complete comparison, below is a simple view of how the SZ3 matches up versus the TL350 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Panasonic SZ3 vs Samsung TL350 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ3 & Samsung TL350. The entire galleries are available at Panasonic SZ3 Gallery & Samsung TL350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic SZ3 over the Samsung TL350
SZ3 | TL350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2013 | ![]() | February 2010 | Newer by 36 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL350 over the Panasonic SZ3
TL350 | SZ3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Panasonic SZ3 and Samsung TL350
SZ3 | TL350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Missing Touch display |
Panasonic SZ3 vs Samsung TL350 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to take into account its weight and size. The Panasonic SZ3 features physical dimensions of 95mm x 56mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 126 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Samsung TL350 has specifications of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs).
Compare the Panasonic SZ3 vs Samsung TL350 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the SZ3 versus the TL350.
![Panasonic SZ3 vs Samsung TL350 size comparison Panasonic SZ3 vs Samsung TL350 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-SZ3-vs-Samsung-TL350-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the SZ3 and TL350 is 96 and 94 respectively.
![Panasonic SZ3 vs Samsung TL350 top view buttons comparison Panasonic SZ3 vs Samsung TL350 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-SZ3-vs-Samsung-TL350-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Panasonic SZ3 vs Samsung TL350 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions merely by going through technical specs. The pic here might give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the SZ3 and TL350.
As you have seen, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You can expect to see the Panasonic SZ3 to produce greater detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos much more aggressively. The fresher SZ3 provides an edge in sensor tech.
![Panasonic SZ3 vs Samsung TL350 sensor size comparison Panasonic SZ3 vs Samsung TL350 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-SZ3-vs-Samsung-TL350-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Panasonic SZ3 vs Samsung TL350 Screen and ViewFinder
![Panasonic SZ3 vs Samsung TL350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Panasonic SZ3 vs Samsung TL350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-SZ3-vs-Samsung-TL350-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Panasonic SZ3 vs Samsung TL350 Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ3 | Samsung TL350 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Panasonic | Samsung |
Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ3 | Samsung TL350 |
Also Known as | - | WB2000 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2013-01-07 | 2010-02-20 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 23 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-250mm (10.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/2.4-5.8 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 16 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1600 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.10 m | 5.20 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 608 x 342 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 138 x 78 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 126 grams (0.28 pounds) | 195 grams (0.43 pounds) |
Dimensions | 95 x 56 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 250 photographs | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | - | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC, internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $150 | $400 |