Panasonic ZR3 vs Samsung TL350
94 Imaging
36 Features
26 Overall
32
![Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-ZR3/Panasonic-ZR3-front.jpg)
![Samsung TL350 front Samsung TL350 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Samsung-TL350/Samsung-TL350-front.jpg)
94 Imaging
33 Features
47 Overall
38
Panasonic ZR3 vs Samsung TL350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-200mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 159g - 98 x 55 x 26mm
- Launched January 2010
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-ZX3
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.4-5.8) lens
- 195g - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Released February 2010
- Additionally Known as WB2000
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Panasonic ZR3 vs Samsung TL350 Overview
Below is a comprehensive assessment of the Panasonic ZR3 vs Samsung TL350, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors Panasonic and Samsung. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the ZR3 (14MP) and TL350 (10MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
The ZR3 was announced at a similar time to the TL350 and they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a full comparison, below is a brief summation of how the ZR3 grades versus the TL350 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Panasonic ZR3 vs Samsung TL350 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3 & Samsung TL350. The whole galleries are viewable at Panasonic ZR3 Gallery & Samsung TL350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZR3 over the Samsung TL350
ZR3 | TL350 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung TL350 over the Panasonic ZR3
TL350 | ZR3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Panasonic ZR3 and Samsung TL350
ZR3 | TL350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2010 | ![]() | February 2010 | Same age |
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither contains Touch screen |
Panasonic ZR3 vs Samsung TL350 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera often, you're going to have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Panasonic ZR3 has got outside dimensions of 98mm x 55mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL350 has dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check out the Panasonic ZR3 vs Samsung TL350 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose during that time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the ZR3 against the TL350.
![Panasonic ZR3 vs Samsung TL350 size comparison Panasonic ZR3 vs Samsung TL350 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-ZR3-vs-Samsung-TL350-size-comparison.jpg)
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the ZR3 and TL350 is 94 and 94 respectively.
![Panasonic ZR3 vs Samsung TL350 top view buttons comparison Panasonic ZR3 vs Samsung TL350 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-ZR3-vs-Samsung-TL350-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Panasonic ZR3 vs Samsung TL350 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its hard to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements just by checking out specifications. The photograph below may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the ZR3 and TL350.
To sum up, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You can expect the Panasonic ZR3 to show more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop shots far more aggressively.
![Panasonic ZR3 vs Samsung TL350 sensor size comparison Panasonic ZR3 vs Samsung TL350 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-ZR3-vs-Samsung-TL350-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Panasonic ZR3 vs Samsung TL350 Screen and ViewFinder
![Panasonic ZR3 vs Samsung TL350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Panasonic ZR3 vs Samsung TL350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-ZR3-vs-Samsung-TL350-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Panasonic ZR3 vs Samsung TL350 Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3 | Samsung TL350 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Panasonic | Samsung |
Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3 | Samsung TL350 |
Also called | Lumix DMC-ZX3 | WB2000 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2010-01-26 | 2010-02-20 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Venus Engine HD II | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-200mm (8.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/2.4-5.8 |
Macro focus range | 3cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 16 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1300 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.30 m | 5.20 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 608 x 342 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 138 x 78 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | AVCHD Lite | H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 159 gr (0.35 lbs) | 195 gr (0.43 lbs) |
Dimensions | 98 x 55 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC, internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $280 | $400 |