Panasonic ZS100 vs Panasonic ZS35
87 Imaging
52 Features
65 Overall
57
89 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
Panasonic ZS100 vs Panasonic ZS35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-250mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 312g - 111 x 65 x 44mm
- Revealed January 2016
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-TZ100
- Updated by Panasonic ZS200
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 305g - 107 x 62 x 32mm
- Revealed January 2014
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-TZ55
- Succeeded the Panasonic ZS30
- Later Model is Panasonic ZS40
Panasonic ZS100 vs Panasonic ZS35 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Panasonic ZS100 and Panasonic ZS35, one being a Large Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are designed by Panasonic. There is a big difference between the resolutions of the ZS100 (20MP) and ZS35 (16MP) and the ZS100 (1") and ZS35 (1/2.3") provide different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe ZS100 was introduced 2 years later than the ZS35 and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Panasonic ZS100 being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Panasonic ZS35 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the ZS100 matches up versus the ZS35 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Panasonic ZS100 vs Panasonic ZS35 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35. The whole galleries are provided at Panasonic ZS100 Gallery and Panasonic ZS35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS100 over the Panasonic ZS35
ZS100 | ZS35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2016 | January 2014 | Fresher by 25 months | |
Manually focus | Dial exact focus | |||
Display resolution | 1040k | 460k | Clearer display (+580k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS35 over the Panasonic ZS100
ZS35 | ZS100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Panasonic ZS100 and Panasonic ZS35
ZS100 | ZS35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display size | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Panasonic ZS100 vs Panasonic ZS35 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor in its weight and volume. The Panasonic ZS100 has external measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 44mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 312 grams (0.69 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS35 has sizing of 107mm x 62mm x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
Examine the Panasonic ZS100 and Panasonic ZS35 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are employing at that time. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the ZS100 and the ZS35.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the ZS100 and ZS35 is 87 and 89 respectively.
Panasonic ZS100 vs Panasonic ZS35 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's tough to picture the difference between sensor sizing purely by reading through technical specs. The visual below might provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the ZS100 and ZS35.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The ZS100 using its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Panasonic ZS100 will resolve more detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images more aggressively. The more recent ZS100 provides an edge in sensor technology.
Panasonic ZS100 vs Panasonic ZS35 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Panasonic ZS100 vs Panasonic ZS35 Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Panasonic | Panasonic |
Model type | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 |
Also referred to as | Lumix DMC-TZ100 | Lumix DMC-TZ55 |
Type | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2016-01-05 | 2014-01-06 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Venus Engine | - |
Sensor type | MOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 13.2 x 8.8mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 116.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Max boosted ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 80 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 49 | 21 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-250mm (10.0x) | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 2.7 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 1,040k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | - | TFT LCD (180 degree tilt) with AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 1,166k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 9.9 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 6.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4K/UHD (3840 x 2160 @ 30p/24p), 1920 x 1080 @ 60p/60i/30p/24p, 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | MPEG-4 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 312g (0.69 lbs) | 305g (0.67 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 111 x 65 x 44mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 107 x 62 x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 70 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 559 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photographs | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $700 | $300 |