Panasonic ZS25 vs Ricoh CX4
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
92 Imaging
33 Features
34 Overall
33
Panasonic ZS25 vs Ricoh CX4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 193g - 105 x 59 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2013
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-TZ35
- Earlier Model is Panasonic ZS20
- Replacement is Panasonic ZS30
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed August 2010
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Panasonic ZS25 vs Ricoh CX4 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Panasonic ZS25 and Ricoh CX4, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands Panasonic and Ricoh. There exists a considerable gap between the resolutions of the ZS25 (16MP) and CX4 (10MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe ZS25 was announced 2 years after the CX4 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the ZS25 grades versus the CX4 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Panasonic ZS25 vs Ricoh CX4 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS25 & Ricoh CX4. The whole galleries are available at Panasonic ZS25 Gallery & Ricoh CX4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS25 over the Ricoh CX4
| ZS25 | CX4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 | August 2010 | More modern by 30 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Panasonic ZS25
| CX4 | ZS25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very precise focus | |||
| Display resolution | 920k | 460k | Crisper display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Panasonic ZS25 and Ricoh CX4
| ZS25 | CX4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurement | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Panasonic ZS25 vs Ricoh CX4 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry around your camera, you're going to have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Panasonic ZS25 features physical measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Ricoh CX4 has proportions of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Take a look at the Panasonic ZS25 and Ricoh CX4 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the ZS25 versus the CX4.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the ZS25 and CX4 is 93 and 92 respectively.
Panasonic ZS25 vs Ricoh CX4 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to picture the gap between sensor sizes only by going over a spec sheet. The picture here may offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the ZS25 and CX4.
As you can see, each of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Panasonic ZS25 to offer you extra detail with its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images more aggressively. The more recent ZS25 should have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Panasonic ZS25 vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Panasonic ZS25 vs Ricoh CX4 Specifications
| Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS25 | Ricoh CX4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Panasonic | Ricoh |
| Model type | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS25 | Ricoh CX4 |
| Also Known as | Lumix DMC-TZ35 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2013-01-07 | 2010-08-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4896 x 3672 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 23 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-480mm (20.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.3-6.4 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1200s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.40 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (220 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 193 gr (0.43 lbs) | 205 gr (0.45 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 260 photographs | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | - | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $300 | $211 |