Panasonic ZS35 vs Sony A9 II
89 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
62 Imaging
75 Features
93 Overall
82
Panasonic ZS35 vs Sony A9 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 305g - 107 x 62 x 32mm
- Launched January 2014
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-TZ55
- Succeeded the Panasonic ZS30
- Successor is Panasonic ZS40
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 51200 (Push to 204800)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 678g - 129 x 96 x 76mm
- Launched October 2019
- Replaced the Sony A9
Panasonic ZS35 vs Sony A9 II Overview
In this write-up, we are evaluating the Panasonic ZS35 vs Sony A9 II, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Pro Mirrorless by companies Panasonic and Sony. There exists a big gap between the resolutions of the ZS35 (16MP) and A9 II (24MP) and the ZS35 (1/2.3") and A9 II (Full frame) feature different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe ZS35 was launched 6 years earlier than the A9 II which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Panasonic ZS35 being a Compact camera and the Sony A9 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go through a in-depth comparison, below is a short highlight of how the ZS35 scores against the A9 II in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Panasonic ZS35 vs Sony A9 II Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 and Sony Alpha A9 Mark II. The complete galleries are provided at Panasonic ZS35 Gallery and Sony A9 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS35 over the Sony A9 II
ZS35 | A9 II |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A9 II over the Panasonic ZS35
A9 II | ZS35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | October 2019 | January 2014 | More modern by 69 months | |
Manually focus | More exact focusing | |||
Display resolution | 1440k | 460k | Clearer display (+980k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Panasonic ZS35 and Sony A9 II
ZS35 | A9 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Panasonic ZS35 vs Sony A9 II Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to factor in its weight and size. The Panasonic ZS35 has got outer measurements of 107mm x 62mm x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs) whilst the Sony A9 II has specifications of 129mm x 96mm x 76mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 3.0") with a weight of 678 grams (1.49 lbs).
Contrast the Panasonic ZS35 vs Sony A9 II in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the ZS35 versus the A9 II.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the ZS35 and A9 II is 89 and 62 respectively.
Panasonic ZS35 vs Sony A9 II Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to visualize the difference between sensor sizes merely by reading through technical specs. The pic below will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the ZS35 and A9 II.
As you can tell, both cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The ZS35 because of its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field trickier and the Sony A9 II will resolve greater detail utilizing its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop pics a little more aggressively. The more aged ZS35 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Panasonic ZS35 vs Sony A9 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Panasonic ZS35 vs Sony A9 II Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 | Sony Alpha A9 Mark II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Panasonic | Sony |
Model type | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 | Sony Alpha A9 Mark II |
Otherwise known as | Lumix DMC-TZ55 | - |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Pro Mirrorless |
Launched | 2014-01-06 | 2019-10-03 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | BIONZ X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 35.6 x 23.8mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 847.3mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 24MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 51200 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 6400 | 204800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 21 | 693 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 24-480mm (20.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.3-6.4 | - |
Macro focusing range | 3cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 1,440k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD (180 degree tilt) with AR coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 3,686k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.78x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/8000s |
Max silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames/s | 20.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Slow Sync., Rear Sync., Red-eye reduction, Wireless, Hi-speed sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 305 grams (0.67 lb) | 678 grams (1.49 lb) |
Dimensions | 107 x 62 x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 129 x 96 x 76mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 690 photos |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-FZ100 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs + continuous, 3 or 5 frames) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II compatible) |
Storage slots | Single | Dual |
Launch cost | $300 | $4,498 |