Panasonic ZS35 vs Sony A900
89 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
54 Imaging
66 Features
62 Overall
64
Panasonic ZS35 vs Sony A900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 305g - 107 x 62 x 32mm
- Launched January 2014
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-TZ55
- Superseded the Panasonic ZS30
- Refreshed by Panasonic ZS40
(Full Review)
- 25MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 895g - 156 x 117 x 82mm
- Announced October 2008
- Later Model is Sony A99
Panasonic ZS35 vs Sony A900 Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Panasonic ZS35 versus Sony A900, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Advanced DSLR by competitors Panasonic and Sony. There exists a sizeable gap between the image resolutions of the ZS35 (16MP) and A900 (25MP) and the ZS35 (1/2.3") and A900 (Full frame) boast totally different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe ZS35 was unveiled 5 years later than the A900 and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Panasonic ZS35 being a Compact camera and the Sony A900 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before going straight to a full comparison, here is a brief summary of how the ZS35 matches up versus the A900 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Panasonic ZS35 vs Sony A900 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 and Sony Alpha DSLR-A900. The full galleries are provided at Panasonic ZS35 Gallery and Sony A900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS35 over the Sony A900
ZS35 | A900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2014 | October 2008 | More recent by 64 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Reasons to pick Sony A900 over the Panasonic ZS35
A900 | ZS35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
Display resolution | 922k | 460k | Clearer display (+462k dot) |
Common features in the Panasonic ZS35 and Sony A900
ZS35 | A900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display sizing | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Panasonic ZS35 vs Sony A900 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you need to consider its weight and size. The Panasonic ZS35 enjoys exterior measurements of 107mm x 62mm x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs) whilst the Sony A900 has specifications of 156mm x 117mm x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") accompanied by a weight of 895 grams (1.97 lbs).
Take a look at the Panasonic ZS35 versus Sony A900 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have at that moment. Below is a front view scale comparison of the ZS35 compared to the A900.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the ZS35 and A900 is 89 and 54 respectively.
Panasonic ZS35 vs Sony A900 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to see the contrast between sensor measurements just by going over a spec sheet. The visual here may provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the ZS35 and A900.
As you can see, both of those cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The ZS35 having a tinier sensor will make achieving shallower DOF tougher and the Sony A900 will offer you greater detail having an extra 9MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The fresher ZS35 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Panasonic ZS35 vs Sony A900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Panasonic ZS35 vs Sony A900 Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Panasonic | Sony |
Model type | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 |
Also referred to as | Lumix DMC-TZ55 | - |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced DSLR |
Launched | 2014-01-06 | 2008-10-22 |
Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 25 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6048 x 4032 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Highest boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 21 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 24-480mm (20.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.3-6.4 | - |
Macro focusing range | 3cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 460k dots | 922k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | TFT LCD (180 degree tilt) with AR coating | TFT Xtra Fine color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/250 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video format | MPEG-4 | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 305 grams (0.67 lb) | 895 grams (1.97 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 107 x 62 x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 156 x 117 x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 79 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1431 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 880 photographs |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32 |
Card slots | Single | 2 |
Retail pricing | $300 | $2,736 |