Panasonic ZS35 vs Sony A6300
89 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44


83 Imaging
66 Features
82 Overall
72
Panasonic ZS35 vs Sony A6300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 305g - 107 x 62 x 32mm
- Announced January 2014
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-TZ55
- Replaced the Panasonic ZS30
- Successor is Panasonic ZS40
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Push to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 404g - 120 x 67 x 49mm
- Announced February 2016
- Previous Model is Sony A6000
- Newer Model is Sony A6500

Panasonic ZS35 vs Sony A6300 Overview
The following is a complete overview of the Panasonic ZS35 and Sony A6300, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Panasonic and Sony. There exists a huge gap between the image resolutions of the ZS35 (16MP) and A6300 (24MP) and the ZS35 (1/2.3") and A6300 (APS-C) enjoy different sensor dimensions.

The ZS35 was unveiled 3 years earlier than the A6300 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Panasonic ZS35 being a Compact camera and the Sony A6300 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a short overview of how the ZS35 grades versus the A6300 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Panasonic ZS35 vs Sony A6300 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 and Sony Alpha a6300. The full galleries are viewable at Panasonic ZS35 Gallery and Sony A6300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS35 over the Sony A6300
ZS35 | A6300 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A6300 over the Panasonic ZS35
A6300 | ZS35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2016 | ![]() | January 2014 | Newer by 25 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Display resolution | 922k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer display (+462k dot) |
Common features in the Panasonic ZS35 and Sony A6300
ZS35 | A6300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Tilting | Tilting display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither has Touch display |
Panasonic ZS35 vs Sony A6300 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera, you should take into account its weight and proportions. The Panasonic ZS35 has external measurements of 107mm x 62mm x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs) and the Sony A6300 has measurements of 120mm x 67mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9") with a weight of 404 grams (0.89 lbs).
Analyze the Panasonic ZS35 and Sony A6300 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the ZS35 against the A6300.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the ZS35 and A6300 is 89 and 83 respectively.

Panasonic ZS35 vs Sony A6300 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by reviewing specifications. The pic below should offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the ZS35 and A6300.
Plainly, both of those cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The ZS35 using its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF more difficult and the Sony A6300 will offer you greater detail having an extra 8MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images far more aggressively. The more aged ZS35 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Panasonic ZS35 vs Sony A6300 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Panasonic ZS35 vs Sony A6300 Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 | Sony Alpha a6300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Panasonic | Sony |
Model type | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 | Sony Alpha a6300 |
Also called | Lumix DMC-TZ55 | - |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced Mirrorless |
Announced | 2014-01-06 | 2016-02-03 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | BIONZ X |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 24MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6000 x 4000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 6400 | 51200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 21 | 425 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 24-480mm (20.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.3-6.4 | - |
Macro focusing range | 3cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 460k dot | 922k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | TFT LCD (180 degree tilt) with AR coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0fps | 11.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.00 m | 6.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Rear Sync., Slow Sync., Red-eye reduction, Hi-speed sync, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 4K (3840 x 2160 @ 30p/24p), 1920 x 1080 (120p, 60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (24p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 305g (0.67 lb) | 404g (0.89 lb) |
Dimensions | 107 x 62 x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 120 x 67 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 85 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 24.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.7 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1437 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 400 images |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | With downloadable app | |
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $300 | $889 |