Panasonic ZS35 vs Sony H200
89 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
67 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
Panasonic ZS35 vs Sony H200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 305g - 107 x 62 x 32mm
- Announced January 2014
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-TZ55
- Previous Model is Panasonic ZS30
- Successor is Panasonic ZS40
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-633mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 530g - 123 x 83 x 87mm
- Introduced January 2013
Panasonic ZS35 vs Sony H200 Overview
The following is a complete comparison of the Panasonic ZS35 versus Sony H200, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies Panasonic and Sony. The resolution of the ZS35 (16MP) and the H200 (20MP) is relatively close and they possess the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe ZS35 was unveiled 13 months after the H200 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both cameras offer different body type with the Panasonic ZS35 being a Compact camera and the Sony H200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving in to a thorough comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the ZS35 scores versus the H200 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Panasonic ZS35 vs Sony H200 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200. The full galleries are viewable at Panasonic ZS35 Gallery & Sony H200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS35 over the Sony H200
ZS35 | H200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2014 | January 2013 | Newer by 13 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Sony H200 over the Panasonic ZS35
H200 | ZS35 |
---|
Common features in the Panasonic ZS35 and Sony H200
ZS35 | H200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Lack of manual focus | |||
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 460k | Same screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | No Touch screen |
Panasonic ZS35 vs Sony H200 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you'll need to consider its weight and size. The Panasonic ZS35 has got outer dimensions of 107mm x 62mm x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs) while the Sony H200 has specifications of 123mm x 83mm x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") accompanied by a weight of 530 grams (1.17 lbs).
Check out the Panasonic ZS35 versus Sony H200 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have during that time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the ZS35 vs the H200.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the ZS35 and H200 is 89 and 67 respectively.
Panasonic ZS35 vs Sony H200 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very tough to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions just by researching technical specs. The image below should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the ZS35 and H200.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You can count on the Sony H200 to provide you with greater detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs far more aggressively. The fresher ZS35 should have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Panasonic ZS35 vs Sony H200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Panasonic ZS35 vs Sony H200 Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Panasonic | Sony |
Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 |
Also called as | Lumix DMC-TZ55 | - |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2014-01-06 | 2013-01-08 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 2920 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Highest boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 21 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-480mm (20.0x) | 24-633mm (26.4x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.3-6.4 | f/3.1-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 3cm | 20cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD (180 degree tilt) with AR coating | ClearPhoto LCD display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames per second | 8.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 6.00 m | 6.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Advanced Flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 305g (0.67 lbs) | 530g (1.17 lbs) |
Dimensions | 107 x 62 x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 123 x 83 x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 pictures |
Style of battery | - | AA |
Battery model | - | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $300 | $250 |