Panasonic ZS35 vs Sony H200
Portability
89 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
89 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
Portability
67 Imaging
45 Features
31 Overall
39
67 Imaging
45 Features
31 Overall
39
Panasonic ZS35 vs Sony H200 Key Specs
Panasonic ZS35
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 305g - 107 x 62 x 32mm
- Announced January 2014
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-TZ55
- Previous Model is Panasonic ZS30
- Successor is Panasonic ZS40
Sony H200
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-633mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 530g - 123 x 83 x 87mm
- Introduced January 2013
Photography Glossary Panasonic ZS35 vs Sony H200 Overview
The following is a complete comparison of the Panasonic ZS35 versus Sony H200, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies Panasonic and Sony. The resolution of the ZS35 (16MP) and the H200 (20MP) is relatively close and they possess the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe ZS35 was unveiled 13 months after the H200 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both cameras offer different body type with the Panasonic ZS35 being a Compact camera and the Sony H200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving in to a thorough comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the ZS35 scores versus the H200 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Panasonic ZS35 vs Sony H200 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200. The full galleries are viewable at Panasonic ZS35 Gallery & Sony H200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS35 over the Sony H200
| ZS35 | H200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2014 |  | January 2013 | Newer by 13 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Sony H200 over the Panasonic ZS35
| H200 | ZS35 |
|---|
Common features in the Panasonic ZS35 and Sony H200
| ZS35 | H200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | No Touch screen |
Panasonic ZS35 vs Sony H200 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you'll need to consider its weight and size. The Panasonic ZS35 has got outer dimensions of 107mm x 62mm x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs) while the Sony H200 has specifications of 123mm x 83mm x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") accompanied by a weight of 530 grams (1.17 lbs).
Check out the Panasonic ZS35 versus Sony H200 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have during that time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the ZS35 vs the H200.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the ZS35 and H200 is 89 and 67 respectively.
Panasonic ZS35 vs Sony H200 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very tough to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions just by researching technical specs. The image below should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the ZS35 and H200.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You can count on the Sony H200 to provide you with greater detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs far more aggressively. The fresher ZS35 should have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Panasonic ZS35 vs Sony H200 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Panasonic ZS35 Portrait photography factors
Sony H200 Portrait photography factors
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
provides face detection autofocus
focusing manually not possible
cannot use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
offers face detect focusing
lack of manual focus
no manual control
cannot use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Panasonic ZS35 Street photography highlights
Sony H200 Street photography highlights
tilting screen
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (305g)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
built in image stabilization (Optical)
fixed screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
heavier than average in class (530g)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Panasonic ZS35 Sports photography info
Sony H200 Sports photography info
amazing zoom range (24-480mm 20.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
provides tracking autofocus
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
amazing zoom range (24-633mm 26.4 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (20MP)
offers tracking focus
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
terrible battery (240 per charge)
has no phase detect AF
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Panasonic ZS35 Travel photography highlights
Sony H200 Travel photography highlights
lighter than competition (305g)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
relatively wide (24mm)
long reach (480mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
has built in flash
really wide (24mm)
great zoom (633mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
terrible battery (240 shots)
heavier than average in class (530 grams)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Panasonic ZS35
Landscape photography with Sony H200
relatively wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (16MP)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
lack of Time Lapse recording
really wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
no manual control
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
terrible battery (240 shots)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Panasonic ZS35 Vlogging info
Sony H200 Vlogging info
relatively wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detection autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition (305 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of external mic socket
really wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detect focusing
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have mic port
heavier than average in class (530g)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Panasonic ZS35 vs Sony H200 Specifications
| Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Panasonic | Sony |
| Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 |
| Also called as | Lumix DMC-TZ55 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2014-01-06 | 2013-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 2920 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 21 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-480mm (20.0x) | 24-633mm (26.4x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.3-6.4 | f/3.1-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 20cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | TFT LCD (180 degree tilt) with AR coating | ClearPhoto LCD display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames per second | 8.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.00 m | 6.80 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Advanced Flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 305g (0.67 lbs) | 530g (1.17 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 107 x 62 x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 123 x 83 x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 pictures |
| Style of battery | - | AA |
| Battery model | - | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $300 | $250 |
