Panasonic ZS35 vs Sony W290
89 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
94 Imaging
34 Features
28 Overall
31
Panasonic ZS35 vs Sony W290 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 305g - 107 x 62 x 32mm
- Announced January 2014
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-TZ55
- Superseded the Panasonic ZS30
- Replacement is Panasonic ZS40
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 167g - 98 x 57 x 23mm
- Launched February 2009
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Panasonic ZS35 vs Sony W290 Overview
Below, we are analyzing the Panasonic ZS35 versus Sony W290, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Panasonic and Sony. There is a huge difference between the resolutions of the ZS35 (16MP) and W290 (12MP) but they possess the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraThe ZS35 was introduced 4 years later than the W290 and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a thorough comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the ZS35 scores versus the W290 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Panasonic ZS35 vs Sony W290 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W290. The whole galleries are viewable at Panasonic ZS35 Gallery and Sony W290 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS35 over the Sony W290
| ZS35 | W290 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2014 | February 2009 | More recent by 60 months | |
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony W290 over the Panasonic ZS35
| W290 | ZS35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More exact focus |
Common features in the Panasonic ZS35 and Sony W290
| ZS35 | W290 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display sizing | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Absent Touch display |
Panasonic ZS35 vs Sony W290 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera often, you'll have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Panasonic ZS35 comes with exterior dimensions of 107mm x 62mm x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs) whilst the Sony W290 has dimensions of 98mm x 57mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Examine the Panasonic ZS35 versus Sony W290 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the ZS35 vs the W290.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the ZS35 and W290 is 89 and 94 respectively.
Panasonic ZS35 vs Sony W290 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements only by reading specifications. The visual here might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the ZS35 and W290.
Plainly, the 2 cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You should expect to see the Panasonic ZS35 to offer extra detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos much more aggressively. The newer ZS35 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Panasonic ZS35 vs Sony W290 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Panasonic ZS35 vs Sony W290 Specifications
| Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W290 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Panasonic | Sony |
| Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W290 |
| Also Known as | Lumix DMC-TZ55 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2014-01-06 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Max boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 21 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-480mm (20.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.3-6.4 | f/3.3-5.2 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 460k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | TFT LCD (180 degree tilt) with AR coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 2 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.00 m | 3.90 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 305 grams (0.67 pounds) | 167 grams (0.37 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 107 x 62 x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 98 x 57 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $300 | $230 |