Panasonic ZS45 vs Samsung PL200
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
94 Imaging
36 Features
22 Overall
30
Panasonic ZS45 vs Samsung PL200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 249g - 108 x 60 x 32mm
- Released January 2015
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-TZ57
- Succeeded the Panasonic ZS40
- Replacement is Panasonic ZS50
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 170g - 100 x 60 x 21mm
- Released July 2010
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Panasonic ZS45 vs Samsung PL200 Overview
Following is a detailed analysis of the Panasonic ZS45 versus Samsung PL200, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Panasonic and Samsung. The resolution of the ZS45 (16MP) and the PL200 (14MP) is very close and they enjoy the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe ZS45 was unveiled 4 years after the PL200 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the ZS45 scores against the PL200 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Panasonic ZS45 vs Samsung PL200 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS45 and Samsung PL200. The full galleries are available at Panasonic ZS45 Gallery and Samsung PL200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS45 over the Samsung PL200
| ZS45 | PL200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2015 |  | July 2010 | More modern by 55 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 1040k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+810k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung PL200 over the Panasonic ZS45
| PL200 | ZS45 |
|---|
Common features in the Panasonic ZS45 and Samsung PL200
| ZS45 | PL200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Panasonic ZS45 vs Samsung PL200 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to consider its weight and volume. The Panasonic ZS45 provides outer dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 32mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs) and the Samsung PL200 has sizing of 100mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check out the Panasonic ZS45 versus Samsung PL200 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the ZS45 vs the PL200.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the ZS45 and PL200 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Panasonic ZS45 vs Samsung PL200 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be tough to picture the difference in sensor sizes simply by viewing a spec sheet. The picture here will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the ZS45 and PL200.
Clearly, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Panasonic ZS45 to result in more detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images far more aggressively. The newer ZS45 provides an edge in sensor tech.
Panasonic ZS45 vs Samsung PL200 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Panasonic ZS45 vs Samsung PL200 Specifications
| Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS45 | Samsung PL200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Panasonic | Samsung |
| Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS45 | Samsung PL200 |
| Other name | Lumix DMC-TZ57 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2015-01-06 | 2010-07-21 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 21 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-480mm (20.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.3-6.4 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.00 m | 4.60 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4 | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 249 grams (0.55 lb) | 170 grams (0.37 lb) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 32mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 100 x 60 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 pictures | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | - | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC'/MMC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $300 | $0 |