Panasonic ZS5 vs Ricoh G700SE

Below is a extended comparison of the Panasonic ZS5 versus Ricoh G700SE, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by brands Panasonic and Ricoh. The resolution of the ZS5 (12MP) and the G700SE (12MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras boast the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The ZS5 was launched 3 months prior to the G700SE so they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before getting straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a short summary of how the ZS5 scores vs the G700SE with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS5 and Ricoh G700SE. The complete galleries are available at Panasonic ZS5 Gallery and Ricoh G700SE Gallery.

If you are looking to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Panasonic ZS5 enjoys physical measurements of 103mm x 60mm x 32mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs) while the Ricoh G700SE has dimensions of 117mm x 68mm x 32mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 307 grams (0.68 lbs).

Check out the Panasonic ZS5 versus Ricoh G700SE in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the ZS5 against the G700SE.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the ZS5 and G700SE is 92 and 88 respectively.

Normally, it can be tough to see the difference in sensor measurements only by going through a spec sheet. The visual below may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the ZS5 and G700SE.

Clearly, both cameras come with the identical sensor size and the same megapixels so you should expect comparable quality of photos though you would want to consider the production date of the cameras into account.