Pentax 645Z vs Samsung GX-1S
49 Imaging
79 Features
74 Overall
77
68 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
Pentax 645Z vs Samsung GX-1S Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.2" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 204800
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax 645AF2 Mount
- 1550g - 156 x 117 x 123mm
- Released April 2014
- Older Model is Pentax 645D
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 605g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
- Released January 2006
Photography Glossary Pentax 645Z vs Samsung GX-1S Overview
Here is a in-depth review of the Pentax 645Z versus Samsung GX-1S, former being a Pro DSLR while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Pentax and Samsung. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the 645Z (51MP) and GX-1S (6MP) and the 645Z (Medium format) and GX-1S (APS-C) have totally different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe 645Z was brought out 8 years later than the GX-1S and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Pentax 645Z being a Large SLR camera and the Samsung GX-1S being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise view of how the 645Z scores versus the GX-1S with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Pentax 645Z vs Samsung GX-1S Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Pentax 645Z & Samsung GX-1S. The entire galleries are available at Pentax 645Z Gallery & Samsung GX-1S Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax 645Z over the Samsung GX-1S
| 645Z | GX-1S | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | April 2014 | January 2006 | Fresher by 101 months | |
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen size | 3.2" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.7") | |
| Screen resolution | 1037k | 210k | Clearer screen (+827k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-1S over the Pentax 645Z
| GX-1S | 645Z |
|---|
Common features in the Pentax 645Z and Samsung GX-1S
| 645Z | GX-1S | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More accurate focusing | |||
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Pentax 645Z vs Samsung GX-1S Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera often, you should factor its weight and size. The Pentax 645Z comes with outside dimensions of 156mm x 117mm x 123mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 4.8") along with a weight of 1550 grams (3.42 lbs) while the Samsung GX-1S has specifications of 125mm x 93mm x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") and a weight of 605 grams (1.33 lbs).
Look at the Pentax 645Z versus Samsung GX-1S in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the 645Z against the GX-1S.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 645Z and GX-1S is 49 and 68 respectively.
Pentax 645Z vs Samsung GX-1S Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's tough to envision the contrast in sensor sizing merely by researching specs. The visual below might give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the 645Z and GX-1S.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The 645Z because of its bigger sensor will make getting bokeh simpler and the Pentax 645Z will provide you with extra detail having its extra 45MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs way more aggressively. The newer 645Z is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Pentax 645Z vs Samsung GX-1S Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Pentax 645Z vs Samsung GX-1S Specifications
| Pentax 645Z | Samsung GX-1S | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Pentax | Samsung |
| Model type | Pentax 645Z | Samsung GX-1S |
| Class | Pro DSLR | Advanced DSLR |
| Released | 2014-04-15 | 2006-01-16 |
| Body design | Large SLR | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | PRIME III | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Medium format | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 51 megapixels | 6 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 8256 x 6192 | 3008 x 2008 |
| Max native ISO | 204800 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 27 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Pentax 645AF2 | Pentax KAF |
| Total lenses | 6 | 151 |
| Crop factor | 0.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3.2" | 2.5" |
| Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dot | 210 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 98% | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.85x | 0.64x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | - |
| Flash options | Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Slow-speed Sync+Red-eye, P-TTL, Trailing Curtain Sync, contrast-control-sync, high-speed sync, wireless sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/125 secs | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p,24p) | - |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 1550 grams (3.42 lb) | 605 grams (1.33 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 156 x 117 x 123mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 4.8") | 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 101 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 26.0 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.7 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 4505 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 650 images | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI90 | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/MMC card |
| Storage slots | Two | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $5,024 | $850 |