Pentax K200D vs Sony H200
61 Imaging
49 Features
41 Overall
45
67 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
Pentax K200D vs Sony H200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 690g - 134 x 95 x 74mm
- Introduced September 2008
- Older Model is Pentax K100D S
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-633mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 530g - 123 x 83 x 87mm
- Released January 2013
Photography Glossary Pentax K200D vs Sony H200 Overview
In this article, we are comparing the Pentax K200D and Sony H200, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Pentax and Sony. There is a substantial difference among the sensor resolutions of the K200D (10MP) and H200 (20MP) and the K200D (APS-C) and H200 (1/2.3") possess different sensor dimensions.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe K200D was announced 5 years prior to the H200 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Pentax K200D being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony H200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the K200D matches up versus the H200 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Pentax K200D vs Sony H200 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Pentax K200D & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200. The whole galleries are available at Pentax K200D Gallery & Sony H200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax K200D over the Sony H200
| K200D | H200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial exact focus |
Reasons to pick Sony H200 over the Pentax K200D
| H200 | K200D | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 | September 2008 | More recent by 53 months | |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Pentax K200D and Sony H200
| K200D | H200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Pentax K200D vs Sony H200 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera often, you are going to need to take into account its weight and size. The Pentax K200D comes with external dimensions of 134mm x 95mm x 74mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 2.9") along with a weight of 690 grams (1.52 lbs) whilst the Sony H200 has specifications of 123mm x 83mm x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") and a weight of 530 grams (1.17 lbs).
Look at the Pentax K200D and Sony H200 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the K200D compared to the H200.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the K200D and H200 is 61 and 67 respectively.
Pentax K200D vs Sony H200 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is tough to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements simply by looking through a spec sheet. The photograph underneath may provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the K200D and H200.
As you can see, the two cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The K200D having a larger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh simpler and the Sony H200 will render extra detail with its extra 10MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images a little more aggressively. The older K200D will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Pentax K200D vs Sony H200 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Pentax K200D vs Sony H200 Specifications
| Pentax K200D | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Pentax | Sony |
| Model type | Pentax K200D | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 |
| Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2008-09-01 | 2013-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact SLR | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 369.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3872 x 2592 | 5184 x 2920 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 11 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Pentax KAF2 | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 24-633mm (26.4x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/3.1-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 20cm |
| Available lenses | 151 | - |
| Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | - | ClearPhoto LCD display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 96 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.57x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 6.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Advanced Flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 690 grams (1.52 lbs) | 530 grams (1.17 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 134 x 95 x 74mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 2.9") | 123 x 83 x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 64 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 22.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 561 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 shots |
| Battery type | - | AA |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/MMC/SDHC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $600 | $250 |