Pentax MX-1 vs Ricoh GR Digital III
84 Imaging
37 Features
60 Overall
46
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c2dcc/c2dccc339151be15969ec6f5278f594ec973c860" alt="Pentax MX-1 front Pentax MX-1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c0394/c039434b1259b0983aa2fa353205f299c35090eb" alt="Ricoh GR Digital III front Ricoh GR Digital III front"
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
Pentax MX-1 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 391g - 122 x 61 x 51mm
- Announced July 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Replacement is Ricoh GR Digital IV
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Pentax MX-1 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Overview
Its time to look a bit more closely at the Pentax MX-1 and Ricoh GR Digital III, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by rivals Pentax and Ricoh. The resolution of the MX-1 (12MP) and the GR Digital III (10MP) is pretty well matched and they feature the exact same sensor sizes (1/1.7").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The MX-1 was brought out 3 years after the GR Digital III which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a in-depth comparison, below is a concise overview of how the MX-1 grades against the GR Digital III in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Pentax MX-1 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Pentax MX-1 and Ricoh GR Digital III. The entire galleries are available at Pentax MX-1 Gallery and Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax MX-1 over the Ricoh GR Digital III
MX-1 | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | July 2013 | ![]() | July 2009 | More modern by 48 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Pentax MX-1
GR Digital III | MX-1 |
---|
Common features in the Pentax MX-1 and Ricoh GR Digital III
MX-1 | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen dimensions |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 920k | Same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch screen |
Pentax MX-1 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you will have to think about its weight and proportions. The Pentax MX-1 offers external measurements of 122mm x 61mm x 51mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 391 grams (0.86 lbs) while the Ricoh GR Digital III has measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") with a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).
Take a look at the Pentax MX-1 and Ricoh GR Digital III in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the MX-1 and the GR Digital III.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f04a5/f04a55edc2f7dd0f541dc0a184698332f478b6eb" alt="Pentax MX-1 vs Ricoh GR Digital III size comparison Pentax MX-1 vs Ricoh GR Digital III size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the MX-1 and GR Digital III is 84 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277d6/277d6d57b3ccf4d765b7484050f16f6dbe30b0fb" alt="Pentax MX-1 vs Ricoh GR Digital III top view buttons comparison Pentax MX-1 vs Ricoh GR Digital III top view buttons comparison"
Pentax MX-1 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to see the difference between sensor sizes merely by looking at specifications. The pic below should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the MX-1 and GR Digital III.
To sum up, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Pentax MX-1 to give more detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more recent MX-1 is going to have an edge in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/497cc/497cc01fe8a151100185ad9ae5a2ea6d2c28b784" alt="Pentax MX-1 vs Ricoh GR Digital III sensor size comparison Pentax MX-1 vs Ricoh GR Digital III sensor size comparison"
Pentax MX-1 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9ce93/9ce931d161834ab5dbd86538754fb30cce605cb8" alt="Pentax MX-1 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and Viewfinder comparison Pentax MX-1 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Pentax MX-1 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Specifications
Pentax MX-1 | Ricoh GR Digital III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Pentax | Ricoh |
Model type | Pentax MX-1 | Ricoh GR Digital III |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2013-07-01 | 2009-07-27 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 25 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/1.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 920k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | TFT LCD with AR coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 1 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m | 3.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Speed sync, Trailing Curtain sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 391g (0.86 pounds) | 208g (0.46 pounds) |
Dimensions | 122 x 61 x 51mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 2.0") | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 208 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 290 photos | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | D-Li-106 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $400 | $399 |