Pentax MX-1 vs Ricoh WG-80
84 Imaging
36 Features
60 Overall
45
91 Imaging
43 Features
35 Overall
39
Pentax MX-1 vs Ricoh WG-80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 391g - 122 x 61 x 51mm
- Released July 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.70" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed May 2022
- Succeeded the Ricoh WG-70
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Pentax MX-1 vs Ricoh WG-80 Overview
Its time to look more in depth at the Pentax MX-1 vs Ricoh WG-80, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Pentax and Ricoh. There is a big difference among the resolutions of the MX-1 (12MP) and WG-80 (16MP) and the MX-1 (1/1.7") and WG-80 (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe MX-1 was launched 10 years before the WG-80 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a in depth comparison, here is a concise view of how the MX-1 scores versus the WG-80 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Pentax MX-1 vs Ricoh WG-80 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Pentax MX-1 and Ricoh WG-80. The complete galleries are provided at Pentax MX-1 Gallery and Ricoh WG-80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax MX-1 over the Ricoh WG-80
| MX-1 | WG-80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display size | 3" | 2.70" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-80 over the Pentax MX-1
| WG-80 | MX-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | May 2022 | July 2013 | Fresher by 108 months |
Common features in the Pentax MX-1 and Ricoh WG-80
| MX-1 | WG-80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial accurate focusing | |||
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither provides Touch display |
Pentax MX-1 vs Ricoh WG-80 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Pentax MX-1 provides physical dimensions of 122mm x 61mm x 51mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 2.0") with a weight of 391 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-80 has dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
See the Pentax MX-1 vs Ricoh WG-80 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the MX-1 against the WG-80.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the MX-1 and WG-80 is 84 and 91 respectively.
Pentax MX-1 vs Ricoh WG-80 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its hard to imagine the difference in sensor sizing merely by looking through specifications. The graphic below will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the MX-1 and WG-80.
Plainly, both the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The MX-1 featuring a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF easier and the Ricoh WG-80 will render extra detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images way more aggressively. The older MX-1 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Pentax MX-1 vs Ricoh WG-80 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Pentax MX-1 vs Ricoh WG-80 Specifications
| Pentax MX-1 | Ricoh WG-80 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Pentax | Ricoh |
| Model | Pentax MX-1 | Ricoh WG-80 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2013-07-01 | 2022-05-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.70" |
| Display resolution | 920k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | TFT LCD with AR coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 12.00 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Speed sync, Trailing Curtain sync | On, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 391g (0.86 lbs) | 193g (0.43 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 61 x 51mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 2.0") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 208 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 290 photos | 300 photos |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | D-Li-106 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $400 | $300 |