Pentax MX-1 vs Samsung SL102
84 Imaging
37 Features
60 Overall
46
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c2dcc/c2dccc339151be15969ec6f5278f594ec973c860" alt="Pentax MX-1 front Pentax MX-1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ea7e4/ea7e4ee78f1fa0fb4022ac36c31077cfef4a19c1" alt="Samsung SL102 front Samsung SL102 front"
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Pentax MX-1 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 391g - 122 x 61 x 51mm
- Introduced July 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Announced January 2009
- Alternate Name is ES55
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Pentax MX-1 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Let's examine more in depth at the Pentax MX-1 vs Samsung SL102, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Pentax and Samsung. The image resolution of the MX-1 (12MP) and the SL102 (10MP) is pretty close but the MX-1 (1/1.7") and SL102 (1/2.3") possess different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The MX-1 was introduced 4 years later than the SL102 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a in-depth comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the MX-1 grades versus the SL102 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Pentax MX-1 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Pentax MX-1 and Samsung SL102. The whole galleries are available at Pentax MX-1 Gallery and Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax MX-1 over the Samsung SL102
MX-1 | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2013 | ![]() | January 2009 | More recent by 55 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Pentax MX-1
SL102 | MX-1 |
---|
Common features in the Pentax MX-1 and Samsung SL102
MX-1 | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lacking Touch screen |
Pentax MX-1 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to factor its weight and size. The Pentax MX-1 offers outer measurements of 122mm x 61mm x 51mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 391 grams (0.86 lbs) and the Samsung SL102 has specifications of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Check the Pentax MX-1 vs Samsung SL102 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the MX-1 versus the SL102.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5c8b7/5c8b74bcaf25c5f39a547f4f7e5d79d14d8fc932" alt="Pentax MX-1 vs Samsung SL102 size comparison Pentax MX-1 vs Samsung SL102 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the MX-1 and SL102 is 84 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/67ff2/67ff2d7da938b59571ade7988c656f49aa799d2f" alt="Pentax MX-1 vs Samsung SL102 top view buttons comparison Pentax MX-1 vs Samsung SL102 top view buttons comparison"
Pentax MX-1 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to visualize the gap in sensor measurements simply by viewing specifications. The graphic underneath might provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the MX-1 and SL102.
Plainly, the 2 cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The MX-1 having a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Pentax MX-1 will provide you with extra detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more modern MX-1 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f74e5/f74e502653432b957b2b4da220a5d80f9122615f" alt="Pentax MX-1 vs Samsung SL102 sensor size comparison Pentax MX-1 vs Samsung SL102 sensor size comparison"
Pentax MX-1 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5b623/5b62382b94a65d6f5d3bedcd4b0404985746f111" alt="Pentax MX-1 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Pentax MX-1 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Pentax MX-1 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
Pentax MX-1 | Samsung SL102 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Pentax | Samsung |
Model type | Pentax MX-1 | Samsung SL102 |
Also called | - | ES55 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2013-07-01 | 2009-01-08 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 25 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
Display resolution | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | TFT LCD with AR coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 8 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Speed sync, Trailing Curtain sync | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 391g (0.86 pounds) | 116g (0.26 pounds) |
Dimensions | 122 x 61 x 51mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 2.0") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 208 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 290 photos | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | D-Li-106 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $400 | $130 |