Pentax MX-1 vs Samsung SL202
84 Imaging
37 Features
60 Overall
46
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c2dcc/c2dccc339151be15969ec6f5278f594ec973c860" alt="Pentax MX-1 front Pentax MX-1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9341/e93412f40c7362d3e09ff5f3d2f972e609f5d64d" alt="Samsung SL202 front Samsung SL202 front"
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Pentax MX-1 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 391g - 122 x 61 x 51mm
- Announced July 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Announced February 2009
- Additionally Known as PL50
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Pentax MX-1 vs Samsung SL202 Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Pentax MX-1 vs Samsung SL202, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by competitors Pentax and Samsung. The image resolution of the MX-1 (12MP) and the SL202 (10MP) is very similar but the MX-1 (1/1.7") and SL202 (1/2.3") possess different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The MX-1 was manufactured 4 years later than the SL202 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a in-depth comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the MX-1 grades versus the SL202 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Pentax MX-1 vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Pentax MX-1 & Samsung SL202. The entire galleries are available at Pentax MX-1 Gallery & Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax MX-1 over the Samsung SL202
MX-1 | SL202 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2013 | ![]() | February 2009 | More recent by 54 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Pentax MX-1
SL202 | MX-1 |
---|
Common features in the Pentax MX-1 and Samsung SL202
MX-1 | SL202 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly display |
Pentax MX-1 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera, you're going to have to factor in its weight and size. The Pentax MX-1 provides physical measurements of 122mm x 61mm x 51mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 391 grams (0.86 lbs) while the Samsung SL202 has specifications of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Contrast the Pentax MX-1 vs Samsung SL202 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the MX-1 against the SL202.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6872/b687286c5b4dfa5b87add6d92a3a59d5399fb042" alt="Pentax MX-1 vs Samsung SL202 size comparison Pentax MX-1 vs Samsung SL202 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the MX-1 and SL202 is 84 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1bc65/1bc650b1850c5abddd99d788f79c43a2fb660b79" alt="Pentax MX-1 vs Samsung SL202 top view buttons comparison Pentax MX-1 vs Samsung SL202 top view buttons comparison"
Pentax MX-1 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to visualize the gap between sensor measurements merely by going over a spec sheet. The graphic underneath might give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the MX-1 and SL202.
Clearly, both of the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The MX-1 because of its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Pentax MX-1 will offer greater detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics much more aggressively. The more recent MX-1 should have a benefit in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2ec35/2ec35eeda343aaccbe686af548149742aa21299f" alt="Pentax MX-1 vs Samsung SL202 sensor size comparison Pentax MX-1 vs Samsung SL202 sensor size comparison"
Pentax MX-1 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c42ff/c42ff9b7a36c18c34095b85051d048cffb363173" alt="Pentax MX-1 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Pentax MX-1 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Pentax MX-1 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
Pentax MX-1 | Samsung SL202 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Pentax | Samsung |
Model | Pentax MX-1 | Samsung SL202 |
Also referred to as | - | PL50 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2013-07-01 | 2009-02-17 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.8-5.7 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 920k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | TFT LCD with AR coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 8 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m | 4.60 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Speed sync, Trailing Curtain sync | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 391g (0.86 lb) | 168g (0.37 lb) |
Dimensions | 122 x 61 x 51mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 2.0") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 208 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 290 photographs | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-Li-106 | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $400 | $140 |