Pentax MX-1 vs Sony H50
84 Imaging
37 Features
60 Overall
46
![Pentax MX-1 front Pentax MX-1 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Pentax-MX-1/Pentax-MX-1-front.jpg)
![Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H50 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H50 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-H50/Sony-H50-front.jpg)
69 Imaging
32 Features
25 Overall
29
Pentax MX-1 vs Sony H50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 391g - 122 x 61 x 51mm
- Announced July 2013
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-465mm (F2.7-4.5) lens
- 547g - 116 x 81 x 86mm
- Introduced January 2009
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Pentax MX-1 vs Sony H50 Overview
Below, we are matching up the Pentax MX-1 vs Sony H50, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Pentax and Sony. There exists a huge gap among the resolutions of the MX-1 (12MP) and H50 (9MP) and the MX-1 (1/1.7") and H50 (1/2.3") possess different sensor size.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
The MX-1 was released 4 years after the H50 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the MX-1 scores vs the H50 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Pentax MX-1 vs Sony H50 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Pentax MX-1 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H50. The complete galleries are viewable at Pentax MX-1 Gallery and Sony H50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax MX-1 over the Sony H50
MX-1 | H50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | July 2013 | ![]() | January 2009 | More modern by 55 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony H50 over the Pentax MX-1
H50 | MX-1 |
---|
Common features in the Pentax MX-1 and Sony H50
MX-1 | H50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither contains Touch display |
Pentax MX-1 vs Sony H50 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera, you will want to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Pentax MX-1 has got outside dimensions of 122mm x 61mm x 51mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 2.0") having a weight of 391 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Sony H50 has dimensions of 116mm x 81mm x 86mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.4") accompanied by a weight of 547 grams (1.21 lbs).
Contrast the Pentax MX-1 vs Sony H50 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are using at the time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the MX-1 versus the H50.
![Pentax MX-1 vs Sony H50 size comparison Pentax MX-1 vs Sony H50 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Pentax-MX-1-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-H50-size-comparison.jpg)
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the MX-1 and H50 is 84 and 69 respectively.
![Pentax MX-1 vs Sony H50 top view buttons comparison Pentax MX-1 vs Sony H50 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Pentax-MX-1-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-H50-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Pentax MX-1 vs Sony H50 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes only by researching technical specs. The pic below will give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the MX-1 and H50.
As you have seen, each of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The MX-1 due to its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Pentax MX-1 will result in greater detail as a result of its extra 3MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos much more aggressively. The fresher MX-1 should have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
![Pentax MX-1 vs Sony H50 sensor size comparison Pentax MX-1 vs Sony H50 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Pentax-MX-1-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-H50-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Pentax MX-1 vs Sony H50 Screen and ViewFinder
![Pentax MX-1 vs Sony H50 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Pentax MX-1 vs Sony H50 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Pentax-MX-1-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-H50-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Pentax MX-1 vs Sony H50 Specifications
Pentax MX-1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H50 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Pentax | Sony |
Model | Pentax MX-1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H50 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2013-07-01 | 2009-01-15 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 9 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3456 x 2592 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 31-465mm (15.0x) |
Max aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.7-4.5 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD with AR coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m | 9.10 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Speed sync, Trailing Curtain sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Front Curtain, Rear Curtain |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480, 30 fps, 320 x 240, 8 fps |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 391 grams (0.86 lbs) | 547 grams (1.21 lbs) |
Dimensions | 122 x 61 x 51mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 2.0") | 116 x 81 x 86mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 208 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 290 photos | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-Li-106 | NP-BG1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $400 | $80 |