Pentax E70 vs Ricoh WG-4
94 Imaging
33 Features
11 Overall
24
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Pentax E70 vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 175g - 94 x 61 x 26mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched February 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Pentax E70 vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the Pentax E70 vs Ricoh WG-4, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by brands Pentax and Ricoh. There exists a sizable gap between the sensor resolutions of the E70 (10MP) and WG-4 (16MP) but they use the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E70 was manufactured 6 years earlier than the WG-4 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a in-depth comparison, below is a brief summary of how the E70 matches up versus the WG-4 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Pentax E70 vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Pentax Optio E70 & Ricoh WG-4. The entire galleries are available at Pentax E70 Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax E70 over the Ricoh WG-4
| E70 | WG-4 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Pentax E70
| WG-4 | E70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2014 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 61 months |
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.4" | Larger display (+0.6") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 112k | Crisper display (+348k dot) |
Common features in the Pentax E70 and Ricoh WG-4
| E70 | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither includes Touch display |
Pentax E70 vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera, you will want to think about its weight and measurements. The Pentax E70 features external measurements of 94mm x 61mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.0") having a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 has proportions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
See the Pentax E70 vs Ricoh WG-4 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select during that time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the E70 vs the WG-4.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E70 and WG-4 is 94 and 90 respectively.
Pentax E70 vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to imagine the gap between sensor measurements only by going over technical specs. The graphic here might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E70 and WG-4.
As you have seen, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You can anticipate the Ricoh WG-4 to offer greater detail due to its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics much more aggressively. The older E70 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Pentax E70 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Pentax E70 vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
| Pentax Optio E70 | Ricoh WG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Pentax | Ricoh |
| Model | Pentax Optio E70 | Ricoh WG-4 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2009-01-05 | 2014-02-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | 10cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.4" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 112k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | - | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 175 grams (0.39 pounds) | 230 grams (0.51 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 94 x 61 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.0") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 photographs |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 2 x AA | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $140 | $330 |
