Pentax E85 vs Samsung WB210
95 Imaging
35 Features
10 Overall
25
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
Pentax E85 vs Samsung WB210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 32-96mm (F2.9-5.2) lens
- 145g - 93 x 58 x 24mm
- Introduced September 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Push to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Launched July 2011
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Pentax E85 vs Samsung WB210 Overview
On this page, we are evaluating the Pentax E85 versus Samsung WB210, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Pentax and Samsung. The resolution of the E85 (12MP) and the WB210 (14MP) is fairly similar and both cameras posses the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E85 was manufactured 22 months before the WB210 making them a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief summation of how the E85 grades versus the WB210 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Pentax E85 vs Samsung WB210 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Pentax Optio E85 and Samsung WB210. The entire galleries are viewable at Pentax E85 Gallery and Samsung WB210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax E85 over the Samsung WB210
| E85 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 1k | Sharper display (+229k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Pentax E85
| WB210 | E85 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2011 |  | September 2009 | More modern by 22 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Display dimensions | 3.5" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.8") |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Pentax E85 and Samsung WB210
| E85 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Pentax E85 vs Samsung WB210 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to factor its weight and volume. The Pentax E85 comes with outside measurements of 93mm x 58mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 145 grams (0.32 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB210 has sizing of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs).
Examine the Pentax E85 versus Samsung WB210 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are using at that time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the E85 against the WB210.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E85 and WB210 is 95 and 94 respectively.
Pentax E85 vs Samsung WB210 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very tough to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes simply by going over a spec sheet. The image below might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E85 and WB210.
Clearly, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You should anticipate the Samsung WB210 to deliver more detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images more aggressively. The more aged E85 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Pentax E85 vs Samsung WB210 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Pentax E85 vs Samsung WB210 Specifications
| Pentax Optio E85 | Samsung WB210 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Pentax | Samsung |
| Model type | Pentax Optio E85 | Samsung WB210 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2009-09-17 | 2011-07-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 32-96mm (3.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.9-5.2 | f/2.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3.5" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 1 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 2s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 145 gr (0.32 lbs) | 174 gr (0.38 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 93 x 58 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | D-LI95 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | microSC/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $0 | $279 |