Pentax E85 vs Samsung WB800F
95 Imaging
34 Features
10 Overall
24
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Pentax E85 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 32-96mm (F2.9-5.2) lens
- 145g - 93 x 58 x 24mm
- Released September 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2013
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Pentax E85 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Pentax E85 versus Samsung WB800F, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Pentax and Samsung. There exists a sizeable gap among the resolutions of the E85 (12MP) and WB800F (16MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E85 was released 4 years before the WB800F and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the E85 scores vs the WB800F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Pentax E85 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Pentax Optio E85 and Samsung WB800F. The complete galleries are provided at Pentax E85 Gallery and Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax E85 over the Samsung WB800F
| E85 | WB800F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Pentax E85
| WB800F | E85 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 |  | September 2009 | Fresher by 40 months |
| Manual focus |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Pentax E85 and Samsung WB800F
| E85 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Pentax E85 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera, you are going to need to take into account its weight and volume. The Pentax E85 comes with outer measurements of 93mm x 58mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 145 grams (0.32 lbs) and the Samsung WB800F has sizing of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Compare the Pentax E85 versus Samsung WB800F in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the E85 and the WB800F.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E85 and WB800F is 95 and 92 respectively.
Pentax E85 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very tough to imagine the difference in sensor sizing purely by seeing specifications. The visual here will provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E85 and WB800F.
To sum up, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You should expect the Samsung WB800F to produce more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The older E85 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Pentax E85 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Pentax E85 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Pentax Optio E85 | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Pentax | Samsung |
| Model | Pentax Optio E85 | Samsung WB800F |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2009-09-17 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 32-96mm (3.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.9-5.2 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 2 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 145g (0.32 pounds) | 218g (0.48 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 93 x 58 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | D-LI95 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $0 | $300 |