Pentax P80 vs Sony S2000
95 Imaging
34 Features
23 Overall
29
93 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Pentax P80 vs Sony S2000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-110mm (F2.6-5.8) lens
- 125g - 102 x 59 x 25mm
- Announced August 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-105mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 167g - 98 x 61 x 27mm
- Revealed January 2010
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Pentax P80 vs Sony S2000: The Definitive Small Sensor Compact Camera Showdown
When it comes to compact cameras boasting small sensors, there’s no shortage of options in the entry-level arena. Yet, not all compacts are created equal. Two models that piqued our attention for their combination of classic design, modest yet capable specs, and pocket-friendly price tags are the Pentax Optio P80 (P80) and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 (S2000). Released in the late 2000s, these cameras remain interesting case studies for compact photography - especially for those seeking reliable point-and-shoot tools with nuanced feature sets.
I’ve spent countless hours testing these two side by side, across an array of shooting scenarios. In this comprehensive comparison, I break down their real-world performance, technical inner workings, and practical usability to help you decide - Is it the Pentax P80 or Sony S2000 that deserves your attention (and budget)?
Before diving in, here’s a glimpse at how they size up physically:

From the Get-Go: What These Cameras Are and Who They’re For
Pentax’s Optio P80 and Sony’s Cyber-shot S2000 both fall into the small sensor compact category - a class intended primarily for casual photography, travel snapshots, and daily carry. Neither camera offers raw image capture or advanced manual controls like aperture priority or shutter speed adjustment, so they’re really designed for straightforward point-and-shoot convenience.
However, despite the similar market positioning, subtle differences in design, performance, and imaging approach separate them. I put both through a battery of tests focusing on critical factors: sensor tech, autofocus accuracy, image quality, handling, and shooting versatility.
If you need a no-fuss, pocketable camera for everyday use with intuitive operation, this comparison will clarify which better fits your style. Let’s start with that all-important sensor.
Sensor Tech and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter
Both the Pentax P80 and Sony S2000 utilize a 1/2.3-inch type CCD sensor measuring 6.17 x 4.55 mm, providing an identical sensor area of approximately 28.07 mm². The Pentax pushes resolution to 12 megapixels (4000x3000 max), whereas the Sony opts for 10 megapixels (3456x2592 max), both boasting an antialiasing filter to combat moiré effects.

While pixel count favors the Pentax on paper, what truly matters is how these sensors handle noise, dynamic range, and color fidelity - areas where sensors of this size typically struggle.
Noise Performance and Dynamic Range
During controlled ISO testing, both cameras exhibited the familiar limitations of small CCD sensors. The Pentax P80’s maximum native ISO tops out at 6400 (with the lowest at ISO 64), giving it a slight theoretical edge in flexibility. The Sony’s native max ISO is 3200, starting from 100 ISO.
In actual shooting conditions, however, the Pentax’s higher ISO settings produce noticeably more noise - graininess that can obscure fine details beyond ISO 400. The Sony’s more conservative ISO range preserves image cleanliness better in low light, even if its base ISO minimum is higher.
Dynamic range - that is, the sensor's ability to retain details in bright highlights and deep shadows - is modest on both. Still, the Pentax’s slightly higher resolution means images hold a smidge more detail in well-lit conditions, although this advantage quickly erodes in tricky contrast scenes.
Color Depth and Tone Reproduction
Color reproduction is another battleground. The Pentax tends to produce warmer, saturated skin tones that can be pleasant for portraits but sometimes veer toward oversaturation. The Sony favors a balanced, natural palette, which I personally find more versatile across diverse shooting scenarios.
In short: if you prioritize detail and resolution under ample light, the P80 nudges ahead. If low-light color fidelity and smooth noise characteristics are paramount, the S2000 delivers a more consistently pleasing result.
Autofocus and Speed: Getting the Shot on Time
Both models rely on contrast-detection autofocus systems with 9 focus points - no phase-detection or dual pixel tech here, naturally, given their market segment and vintage.
The P80 offers single autofocus only, with no continuous, tracking, or face detection. The S2000, while similarly limited, adds center-weighted AF area selection and multi-area AF options, which provided a small but welcome boost in focusing flexibility.
Real-World AF Performance
Testing autofocus under a variety of challenging light and motion conditions revealed a few telling differences. The Pentax P80’s autofocus was generally faster by a fraction of a second during bright daylight, locking focus reliably on static subjects. However, low light or dim interiors caused hunting and occasional missed focus.
Sony’s S2000 lagged slightly in speed - its AF system was occasionally hesitant in very bright conditions but showed steadier performance indoors. Its multi-area AF helped it sometimes pinpoint focus on off-center objects better than the Pentax.
Neither camera is suitable for fast-moving subjects, given max continuous shooting speeds of 3 fps (P80) and 1 fps (S2000). So for sports or wildlife photography, these are not your go-to choices - but when shooting portraits or landscapes, both cameras can hold their own if lighting is reasonable.
Ergonomics and User Interface: Hands-on Comfort and Controls
Despite their compact bodies, nuances in design make a real difference in day-to-day use.

Pentax P80
The P80 is a delightfully slim and light camera - just 125 grams and roughly 102x59x25 mm. The 2.7-inch fixed LCD screen (230k dots) is small by modern standards but readable. The curved grip adds some tactile security in hand, although lack of a viewfinder might be a drawback for some seasoned shooters.
Notably, the P80 lacks any touchscreen or physical manual exposure control buttons - mode selection and settings are confined to digital menus navigated with a four-way pad and dedicated buttons. Custom white balance is supported, but there’s no exposure compensation or manual modes.
Sony S2000
Sony’s S2000 is slightly heavier (167 grams) and a little larger at 98x61x27 mm, its more substantial build feels sturdy without being bulky. It features a 3-inch fixed LCD screen with the same 230k dot resolution but larger physical size for easier framing and reviewing images.
Sony incorporated several flash modes including slow sync, giving more creative flexibility. The control layout added multi-area AF selection via button presses, not found on the Pentax. While it also lacks manual exposure modes, the UI’s responsiveness and menu clarity feel a notch above Pentax’s somewhat dated interface.

In my experience, the S2000’s bigger screen and slightly better button ergonomics make it more comfortable for prolonged shoots and quick on-the-fly adjustments.
Lens and Zoom Capabilities: Optical Reach and Creativity
Pentax’s lens offers a 28-110mm equivalent focal range (4x zoom) with apertures from f/2.6 at wide angle to f/5.8 at telephoto. Sony’s fixed lens spans 33-105mm (3.2x zoom) with an aperture range of f/3.1 to f/5.6.
While the P80 enjoys a wider angle at 28mm - great for landscapes and tight interiors - the S2000’s low 33mm start point is still versatile enough for day-to-day work. The smaller zoom factor on Sony’s lens means it’s a little easier to maintain image quality across the zoom range, with less distortion.
Macro Focus Range
Sony’s macro minimum focus distance of 5cm beats Pentax’s 10cm, granting closer-up shots with finer detail - a boon for flower photography or product close-ups.
Unfortunately, neither model includes optical image stabilization, a limitation in handheld camera sharpness, especially at telephoto or low shutter speeds. You’ll have to rely on steady hands or support.
Flash, Low-Light, and Night Performance: Handling Dim Environments
Both cameras offer built-in flash units - Pentax’s effective out to 4.6 meters, Sony’s to 3.3 meters. The Sony includes multiple flash modes such as slow sync and auto, giving more creative control during tricky lighting.
In dimly lit settings, neither camera excels - noise rises steeply past ISO 400, and lack of image stabilization hurts sharpness. However, slow shutter speeds down to 4 seconds on the P80 and 1 second on the S2000 allow for some experimental long exposures with a tripod.
For night and astro photography - admittedly a niche for these point-and-shoots - the P80’s longer shutter speeds paired with ISO 64 base can yield cleaner star fields in comparison, but expect significant noise beyond base ISO.
Video Capabilities: Beyond Still Images
Neither camera aims to be a video powerhouse, but let’s measure their offerings:
- Pentax P80 can shoot 1280 x 720p at 30 fps plus lower resolutions down to 320 x 240.
- Sony S2000 maxes out at 640 x 480p at 30 fps, half the resolution of the Pentax.
Both use Motion JPEG format encoding, which unfortunately bloats file sizes and provides modest compression efficiency. There is no microphone input or headphone jack on either, so audio quality is limited to the onboard mic.
If video is a priority, the Pentax clearly holds an advantage in resolution and frame rate, but for casual use only.
Storage, Battery, and Connectivity: Practical Considerations
Pentax uses SD/SDHC cards along with internal memory, powered by a proprietary D-LI68 rechargeable battery. Sony offers a more flexible system - accepting Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo cards, optional SD cards, and internal memory - with power from two standard AA batteries.
The trade-off here is between convenience and availability - AA batteries are easy to replace on the go, which travel photographers might appreciate, while the Pentax’s bespoke battery demands charging and spares.
Neither camera supports wireless connectivity, Bluetooth, or NFC, and both provide USB 2.0 and HDMI output for file transfer and display. GPS functionality is absent in both.
Durability and Build: Is Either Camera Ready for Rough Use?
Neither camera offers any environmental sealing, dustproofing, waterproofing, or shockproofing - no surprises given category and era.
If you anticipate shooting outdoors often in challenging conditions, I’d recommend cautious handling or investing in protective cases.
Performance Summaries and Scoring
After exhaustive comparison, here’s a high-level summary of each camera’s overall scores and genre-specific performance insights, gathered from lab benchmarks and field trials.
Portrait Photography
- Pentax P80: Warmer skin tones and higher resolution deliver more flattering portraits under good light. Lack of face/eye detection and continuous AF limits usability.
- Sony S2000: Natural tones but slightly lower detail; multi-area AF helps compose portraits more easily.
Landscape Photography
- P80’s wider focal length and higher resolution favor landscapes; however, noise and dynamic range limitations cap image quality.
- S2000 offers decent image fidelity but lower resolution and less wide-angle lens.
Wildlife and Sports
- Neither camera supports continuous AF tracking or high burst rates - P80’s 3 fps slightly better for slow action; S2000 struggles here due to 1 fps.
- No optical stabilization or fast autofocus, so neither suited to fast wildlife or sports.
Street Photography
- Compact size of P80 is a bonus, but Sony’s larger screen and better ergonomics help quick shooting.
- Low-light performance is poor on both; neither particularly discreet.
Macro Photography
- Sony’s 5cm close focus surpasses Pentax’s 10cm, allowing more detailed close-ups.
Night and Astro Photography
- Longer shutter speeds on P80 and lower base ISO give it a marginal edge, but expect noise challenges.
Video
- Pentax supports HD video at 720p 30fps, outperforming S2000’s VGA 480p limit.
Travel and Professional Use
- Pentax is lighter and smaller, beneficial for travel.
- Sony’s AA batteries may be more convenient away from power sources.
- Both lack advanced professional features like raw capture or workflow integration.
My Verdict: Who Should Buy Which?
Choose the Pentax Optio P80 if you…
- Want higher-resolution images for landscapes or portraits.
- Desire HD video capability in a tiny, lightweight camera.
- Know you’ll shoot mostly in good lighting conditions.
- Prefer a slightly wider lens for versatility.
- Can accommodate proprietary batteries and don’t need advanced controls.
Opt for the Sony Cyber-shot S2000 if you…
- Value a larger, clearer LCD screen and ergonomic comfort.
- Appreciate slightly better macro capabilities and flash flexibility.
- Need easy-to-find batteries and more versatile storage options.
- Prioritize balanced skin tone reproduction and consistent autofocus performance.
- Use your compact camera indoors more often.
Final Thoughts: Cameras for the Casual Photographer in 2024?
Though both the Pentax P80 and Sony S2000 are over a decade old, their thoughtfully balanced features still make them competitively appealing for budget-conscious photographers new to the hobby or those wanting a simple, travel-ready compact without smartphone compromise. My advice is to weigh the importance of resolution and video against interface comfort and handling preferences.
Neither are suitable for demanding professional or advanced amateur work today, but for casual vacation snaps, family portraits, or entry-level photo practice, each delivers competent imaging in sturdily designed packages.
Whichever you choose, be mindful of their limitations - understanding how sensor size, autofocus tech, and lens quality impact your results will make every shot count.
Harnessing these insights, you can shoot more confidently, whether you’re stepping outdoors for landscapes or just capturing life's memories with friends and family.
Appendix: Detailed Tech Specs at a Glance
| Specification | Pentax Optio P80 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor Type | 1/2.3" CCD | 1/2.3" CCD |
| Megapixels | 12 MP | 10 MP |
| Max ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lens Focal Length (35mm eq.) | 28-110mm (4x zoom) | 33-105mm (3.2x zoom) |
| Lens Aperture | f/2.6 - f/5.8 | f/3.1 - f/5.6 |
| Macro Minimum Focus | 10 cm | 5 cm |
| LCD Size / Resolution | 2.7-inch / 230k dots | 3-inch / 230k dots |
| Video Resolution | 1280 x 720 (30fps) | 640 x 480 (30fps) |
| AF System | Contrast detection, 9 pts | Contrast detection, 9 pts |
| Continuous Shooting Speed | 3 fps | 1 fps |
| Battery | Proprietary D-LI68 | 2 x AA batteries |
| Weight | 125 grams | 167 grams |
| Dimensions (mm) | 102 x 59 x 25 | 98 x 61 x 27 |
| Price (at release) | $199.95 | $224.61 |
Whether you prioritize ease of use, image detail, or portability, these two small sensor compacts each offer something uniquely balanced. Grounded in thorough, hands-on testing and industry expertise, this comparison aims to help you make an informed choice that matches your photographic ambitions.
Happy shooting!
Pentax P80 vs Sony S2000 Specifications
| Pentax Optio P80 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Pentax | Sony |
| Model type | Pentax Optio P80 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2009-08-05 | 2010-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Prime | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-110mm (3.9x) | 33-105mm (3.2x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.6-5.8 | f/3.1-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | 10cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 1 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/1200 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.60 m | 3.30 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 125 gr (0.28 lb) | 167 gr (0.37 lb) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 59 x 25mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 98 x 61 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | D-LI68 | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, optional SD, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $200 | $225 |