Pentax RS1500 vs Ricoh WG-30W
93 Imaging
37 Features
30 Overall
34
![Pentax Optio RS1500 front Pentax Optio RS1500 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Pentax-Optio-RS1500/Pentax-RS1500-front.jpg)
![Ricoh WG-30W front Ricoh WG-30W front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Ricoh-WG-30W/Ricoh-WG-30W-front.jpg)
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Pentax RS1500 vs Ricoh WG-30W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-110mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 157g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Launched March 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 194g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed October 2014
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Pentax RS1500 vs Ricoh WG-30W Overview
Let's examine more in depth at the Pentax RS1500 vs Ricoh WG-30W, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by companies Pentax and Ricoh. The image resolution of the RS1500 (14MP) and the WG-30W (16MP) is very close and they possess the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
The RS1500 was released 4 years before the WG-30W which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a detailed comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the RS1500 scores against the WG-30W for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Pentax RS1500 vs Ricoh WG-30W Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Pentax Optio RS1500 and Ricoh WG-30W. The complete galleries are viewable at Pentax RS1500 Gallery and Ricoh WG-30W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax RS1500 over the Ricoh WG-30W
RS1500 | WG-30W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30W over the Pentax RS1500
WG-30W | RS1500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | October 2014 | ![]() | March 2011 | More modern by 43 months |
Common features in the Pentax RS1500 and Ricoh WG-30W
RS1500 | WG-30W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Identical display measurements |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Equal display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither offers Touch display |
Pentax RS1500 vs Ricoh WG-30W Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera, you should consider its weight and measurements. The Pentax RS1500 offers external dimensions of 114mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 157 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-30W has proportions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check out the Pentax RS1500 vs Ricoh WG-30W in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you select at the time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the RS1500 versus the WG-30W.
![Pentax RS1500 vs Ricoh WG-30W size comparison Pentax RS1500 vs Ricoh WG-30W size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Pentax-Optio-RS1500-vs-Ricoh-WG-30W-size-comparison.jpg)
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the RS1500 and WG-30W is 93 and 91 respectively.
![Pentax RS1500 vs Ricoh WG-30W top view buttons comparison Pentax RS1500 vs Ricoh WG-30W top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Pentax-Optio-RS1500-vs-Ricoh-WG-30W-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Pentax RS1500 vs Ricoh WG-30W Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be hard to envision the difference in sensor sizes simply by looking through specifications. The pic underneath might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the RS1500 and WG-30W.
To sum up, each of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You should expect to see the Ricoh WG-30W to provide you with more detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more aged RS1500 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
![Pentax RS1500 vs Ricoh WG-30W sensor size comparison Pentax RS1500 vs Ricoh WG-30W sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Pentax-Optio-RS1500-vs-Ricoh-WG-30W-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Pentax RS1500 vs Ricoh WG-30W Screen and ViewFinder
![Pentax RS1500 vs Ricoh WG-30W Screen and Viewfinder comparison Pentax RS1500 vs Ricoh WG-30W Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Pentax-Optio-RS1500-vs-Ricoh-WG-30W-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Pentax RS1500 vs Ricoh WG-30W Specifications
Pentax Optio RS1500 | Ricoh WG-30W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Pentax | Ricoh |
Model type | Pentax Optio RS1500 | Ricoh WG-30W |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Launched | 2011-03-16 | 2014-10-09 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-110mm (3.9x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.90 m | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 157 grams (0.35 lbs) | 194 grams (0.43 lbs) |
Dimensions | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 260 images | 300 images |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $150 | $280 |