Pentax RZ10 vs Ricoh WG-4
92 Imaging
36 Features
31 Overall
34
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Pentax RZ10 vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 178g - 97 x 61 x 33mm
- Revealed July 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Released February 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Pentax RZ10 vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
Below is a detailed comparison of the Pentax RZ10 versus Ricoh WG-4, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Pentax and Ricoh. The resolution of the RZ10 (14MP) and the WG-4 (16MP) is relatively close and both cameras offer the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe RZ10 was announced 3 years before the WG-4 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a thorough comparison, here is a quick overview of how the RZ10 scores versus the WG-4 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Pentax RZ10 vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Pentax Optio RZ10 and Ricoh WG-4. The whole galleries are viewable at Pentax RZ10 Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax RZ10 over the Ricoh WG-4
| RZ10 | WG-4 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Pentax RZ10
| WG-4 | RZ10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2014 | July 2011 | More recent by 31 months | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Pentax RZ10 and Ricoh WG-4
| RZ10 | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial precise focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Pentax RZ10 vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera, you will have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Pentax RZ10 enjoys outer dimensions of 97mm x 61mm x 33mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 178 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 has measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Look at the Pentax RZ10 versus Ricoh WG-4 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have at that moment. Below is a front view scale comparison of the RZ10 compared to the WG-4.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the RZ10 and WG-4 is 92 and 90 respectively.
Pentax RZ10 vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its hard to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements purely by researching a spec sheet. The visual below might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the RZ10 and WG-4.
As you can see, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You should count on the Ricoh WG-4 to result in extra detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs more aggressively. The older RZ10 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Pentax RZ10 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Pentax RZ10 vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
| Pentax Optio RZ10 | Ricoh WG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Pentax | Ricoh |
| Model type | Pentax Optio RZ10 | Ricoh WG-4 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2011-07-19 | 2014-02-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.80 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 178g (0.39 lbs) | 230g (0.51 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 97 x 61 x 33mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 178 pictures | 240 pictures |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $200 | $330 |