Pentax RZ10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
92 Imaging
36 Features
31 Overall
34
90 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Pentax RZ10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 178g - 97 x 61 x 33mm
- Introduced July 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2014
- Replacement is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Pentax RZ10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
Below is a thorough overview of the Pentax RZ10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by companies Pentax and Ricoh. The image resolution of the RZ10 (14MP) and the WG-4 GPS (16MP) is pretty comparable and they enjoy the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe RZ10 was unveiled 3 years before the WG-4 GPS and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a in-depth comparison, below is a simple summation of how the RZ10 grades against the WG-4 GPS when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Pentax RZ10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Pentax Optio RZ10 & Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The full galleries are viewable at Pentax RZ10 Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax RZ10 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| RZ10 | WG-4 GPS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Pentax RZ10
| WG-4 GPS | RZ10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2014 | July 2011 | More recent by 31 months | |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Pentax RZ10 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| RZ10 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial exact focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Pentax RZ10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera often, you will want to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Pentax RZ10 offers exterior dimensions of 97mm x 61mm x 33mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 178 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Check out the Pentax RZ10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the RZ10 compared to the WG-4 GPS.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the RZ10 and WG-4 GPS is 92 and 90 respectively.
Pentax RZ10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to envision the difference in sensor measurements simply by seeing a spec sheet. The visual underneath should offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the RZ10 and WG-4 GPS.
As you can see, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to provide greater detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs far more aggressively. The older RZ10 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Pentax RZ10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Pentax RZ10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
| Pentax Optio RZ10 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Pentax | Ricoh |
| Model type | Pentax Optio RZ10 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2011-07-19 | 2014-02-05 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.80 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 178 gr (0.39 lb) | 235 gr (0.52 lb) |
| Dimensions | 97 x 61 x 33mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 178 images | 240 images |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $200 | $210 |