Pentax RZ10 vs Samsung TL350
92 Imaging
36 Features
31 Overall
34
94 Imaging
33 Features
47 Overall
38
Pentax RZ10 vs Samsung TL350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 178g - 97 x 61 x 33mm
- Introduced July 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.4-5.8) lens
- 195g - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Released February 2010
- Also referred to as WB2000
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Pentax RZ10 vs Samsung TL350 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Pentax RZ10 versus Samsung TL350, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by companies Pentax and Samsung. There exists a considerable gap between the sensor resolutions of the RZ10 (14MP) and TL350 (10MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe RZ10 was introduced 18 months after the TL350 which makes them a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a in depth comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the RZ10 scores against the TL350 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Pentax RZ10 vs Samsung TL350 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Pentax Optio RZ10 & Samsung TL350. The whole galleries are available at Pentax RZ10 Gallery & Samsung TL350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax RZ10 over the Samsung TL350
| RZ10 | TL350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2011 | February 2010 | More modern by 18 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL350 over the Pentax RZ10
| TL350 | RZ10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Pentax RZ10 and Samsung TL350
| RZ10 | TL350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More accurate focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Pentax RZ10 vs Samsung TL350 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Pentax RZ10 comes with exterior measurements of 97mm x 61mm x 33mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 178 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Samsung TL350 has dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check the Pentax RZ10 versus Samsung TL350 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are using during that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the RZ10 compared to the TL350.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the RZ10 and TL350 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Pentax RZ10 vs Samsung TL350 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very hard to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes just by reviewing technical specs. The image underneath will provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the RZ10 and TL350.
As you have seen, each of these cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Pentax RZ10 to deliver more detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more recent RZ10 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Pentax RZ10 vs Samsung TL350 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Pentax RZ10 vs Samsung TL350 Specifications
| Pentax Optio RZ10 | Samsung TL350 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Pentax | Samsung |
| Model | Pentax Optio RZ10 | Samsung TL350 |
| Also called as | - | WB2000 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2011-07-19 | 2010-02-20 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/2.4-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.80 m | 5.20 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 608 x 342 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 138 x 78 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 178 grams (0.39 pounds) | 195 grams (0.43 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 97 x 61 x 33mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 178 photos | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $200 | $400 |