Pentax RZ10 vs Samsung TL500
92 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34
88 Imaging
34 Features
54 Overall
42
Pentax RZ10 vs Samsung TL500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 178g - 97 x 61 x 33mm
- Released July 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F1.8-2.4) lens
- 386g - 114 x 63 x 29mm
- Introduced July 2010
- Also Known as EX1
Pentax RZ10 vs Samsung TL500 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Pentax RZ10 vs Samsung TL500, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by manufacturers Pentax and Samsung. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the RZ10 (14MP) and TL500 (10MP) and the RZ10 (1/2.3") and TL500 (1/1.7") provide totally different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe RZ10 was revealed 13 months later than the TL500 which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a detailed comparison, here is a concise overview of how the RZ10 grades vs the TL500 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax RZ10 vs Samsung TL500 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Pentax Optio RZ10 & Samsung TL500. The full galleries are provided at Pentax RZ10 Gallery & Samsung TL500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax RZ10 over the Samsung TL500
RZ10 | TL500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | July 2011 | July 2010 | Fresher by 13 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL500 over the Pentax RZ10
TL500 | RZ10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 614k | 230k | Sharper screen (+384k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Pentax RZ10 and Samsung TL500
RZ10 | TL500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial precise focus | |||
Touch screen | Neither has Touch screen |
Pentax RZ10 vs Samsung TL500 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Pentax RZ10 has physical measurements of 97mm x 61mm x 33mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 178 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Samsung TL500 has dimensions of 114mm x 63mm x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 386 grams (0.85 lbs).
Take a look at the Pentax RZ10 vs Samsung TL500 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the RZ10 compared to the TL500.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the RZ10 and TL500 is 92 and 88 respectively.
Pentax RZ10 vs Samsung TL500 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very difficult to see the contrast between sensor sizing purely by reading through specifications. The photograph underneath will give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the RZ10 and TL500.
To sum up, each of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The RZ10 with its tinier sensor will make getting bokeh harder and the Pentax RZ10 will give you greater detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more recent RZ10 will have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Pentax RZ10 vs Samsung TL500 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Pentax RZ10 vs Samsung TL500 Specifications
Pentax Optio RZ10 | Samsung TL500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Pentax | Samsung |
Model type | Pentax Optio RZ10 | Samsung TL500 |
Also called as | - | EX1 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2011-07-19 | 2010-07-09 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/1.8-2.4 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 2.80 m | 5.20 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 178 gr (0.39 lb) | 386 gr (0.85 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 97 x 61 x 33mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 114 x 63 x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 40 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 19.2 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.1 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 129 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 178 images | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | SLB-07A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC, internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $200 | $527 |