Pentax RZ18 vs Samsung WB800F
92 Imaging
38 Features
37 Overall
37
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Pentax RZ18 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 178g - 97 x 61 x 33mm
- Launched September 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Launched January 2013
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Pentax RZ18 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Below is a comprehensive assessment of the Pentax RZ18 vs Samsung WB800F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands Pentax and Samsung. The resolution of the RZ18 (16MP) and the WB800F (16MP) is fairly similar and they come with the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe RZ18 was launched 16 months before the WB800F making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a thorough comparison, below is a simple view of how the RZ18 scores versus the WB800F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Pentax RZ18 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Pentax Optio RZ18 & Samsung WB800F. The complete galleries are available at Pentax RZ18 Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax RZ18 over the Samsung WB800F
| RZ18 | WB800F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Pentax RZ18
| WB800F | RZ18 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 | September 2011 | More recent by 16 months | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Pentax RZ18 and Samsung WB800F
| RZ18 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display size | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 460k | Exact same display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Pentax RZ18 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Pentax RZ18 has got outside dimensions of 97mm x 61mm x 33mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 178 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB800F has dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Compare the Pentax RZ18 vs Samsung WB800F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the RZ18 compared to the WB800F.

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the RZ18 and WB800F is 92 and 92 respectively.
Pentax RZ18 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's tough to visualize the difference between sensor measurements purely by going over a spec sheet. The photograph underneath should give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the RZ18 and WB800F.
As you can see, each of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the same exact MP so you can expect similar quality of photographs though you should factor the age of the products into consideration. The older RZ18 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Pentax RZ18 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Pentax RZ18 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Pentax Optio RZ18 | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Pentax | Samsung |
| Model type | Pentax Optio RZ18 | Samsung WB800F |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2011-09-12 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 4cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.80 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 178g (0.39 pounds) | 218g (0.48 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 97 x 61 x 33mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $210 | $300 |