Pentax RZ18 vs Sony WX1
92 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38


96 Imaging
33 Features
18 Overall
27
Pentax RZ18 vs Sony WX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 178g - 97 x 61 x 33mm
- Launched September 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 160 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.4-5.9) lens
- 149g - 91 x 52 x 20mm
- Revealed August 2009

Pentax RZ18 vs Sony WX1: A Hands-On Comparison for Practical Photography Enthusiasts
When hunting for a budget-friendly point-and-shoot that punches above its weight, two cameras from the early 2010s still catch the occasional retrospection: the Pentax Optio RZ18 and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX1. Though not flagship-grade, both offer remarkably distinct approaches to compact photography, and for those on a shoestring budget or curious about vintage gear, understanding their real-world performance can save you a lot of disappointment (or spark a hidden gem purchase moment).
Having tested these two extensively, alongside hundreds of other models, I’m here to break down how these cameras stack up in everyday use - covering technical merits, field performance, and best-fit user scenarios. We'll traverse all major photography genres, dig into specs with context, and recommend the right model for your photographic ambitions.
Without further ado, let’s dive in.
First Impressions: Size, Handling & Ergonomics
Anyone who’s spent time comparing compact cameras will tell you that size and comfort are often a dealmaker (or breaker). The feel in your hands directly impacts stability and shooting confidence.
Pentax RZ18
The RZ18 clocks in at 97 x 61 x 33 mm and weighs about 178g with battery - chunky for a compact but not oversized considering its superzoom lens (25–450mm equivalent, an 18x range). The grip is subtle but present, enough to encourage a steady hold. Controls are minimal; no clubs for thumbs here, pretty much just point-and-shoot simplicity.
Sony WX1
In contrast, the WX1 is more slick and pocketable at 91 x 52 x 20 mm, tipping the scales at 149g. It’s genuinely ultracompact with a slim profile, emphasizing portability above all. While it slips into a small jacket pocket, those with meaty mitts might find the controls a bit cramped.
Ergonomically, I found the WX1 awkward in extended use due to the small size, while the RZ18’s slightly larger body made for steadier handling, especially when zoomed in.
Design & User Interface: Controls and Screen Quality
Good design streamlines photography - fewer frustrations, more shots captured when opportunity knocks.
Both cameras opt for fixed LCDs instead of viewfinders, nudging users to rely on screen composition.
Pentax RZ18
The RZ18 features a 3.0-inch TFT LCD with anti-reflective coating and 460k-dot resolution, striking a decent balance between brightness and clarity. This means composing shots outdoors is somewhat easier, though not perfect under direct sunlight.
Buttons are logically laid out, though the absence of dedicated manual controls or clubs means frequent menu diving to tweak settings. Its “live view” contrast-detection autofocus is basic – nothing to set your heart racing, but serviceable.
Sony WX1
Sony’s WX1 has a 2.7-inch LCD at 230k dots, noticeably dimmer and less precise than the Pentax. That smaller screen can be a pain for framing fine details, especially in bright light.
Its control scheme trades complexity for simplicity: fewer buttons but also fewer direct adjustments. Zoom control is smooth and fast, a boon for casual users hunting street moments or close-ups.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter
If you’re like me, image quality is the star of the show. Sensor size, resolution, and noise performance govern what kind of pictures you can get and how wide you can push post-processing.
Pentax RZ18
The RZ18 uses a 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor with 16 megapixels of resolution (4608 x 3456). While CCDs can produce pleasant color rendition and low read noise in some scenarios, they tend to struggle with high ISO noise and dynamic range compared to modern CMOS sensors.
It supports ISO 80 to 6400, but practical use beyond ISO 400 is questionable, with noise becoming quite prominent. The sensor size (6.08 x 4.56 mm) is typical for superzooms, but the 18x zoom ratio demands compromises, especially in image sharpness at longer focal lengths.
Sony WX1
Sony’s WX1 packs a 1/2.4-inch backside-illuminated CMOS sensor with 10 megapixels (3648 x 2736). The BSI-CMOS tech is notable for improved low-light performance relative to CCDs, thanks to better light gathering efficiency.
The ISO range tops out at 3200 native (minimum 160), and while 10MP resolution is less than the Pentax, cleaner images and superior noise control at elevated ISOs are evident. Detail rendition is sufficient for casual prints and screen use.
Real-world verdict: WX1 offers cleaner images at higher ISOs and better shadow detail retention, whereas the RZ18 can capture higher resolution in good light but lags in dynamic range and noise control.
Autofocus and Shooting Performance - Eye on Speed and Accuracy
Autofocus (AF) systems make or break candid moments, especially in wildlife, sports, and street photography where split-second focus is crucial.
Both cameras feature contrast-detection AF with 9 selectable focus points.
Pentax RZ18
- Single AF mode with aftracking capability.
- No face or eye detection - a bummer for portrait photographers.
- Autofocus speed: moderate to slow, especially in low light or zoomed tele.
- Continuous shooting speed: 1 fps, extremely limited for action.
- Stabilization: sensor-shift IS, providing a few stops of shake reduction.
Sony WX1
- Single AF without tracking but with an option for center weighted focus.
- No face detection or eye AF.
- Autofocus speed noticeably faster than the RZ18, thanks in part to the Bionz processor.
- Continuous burst shooting: 10 fps, a major advantage in sports or quick street snaps.
- Stabilization: Optical IS, generally superior in effectiveness to sensor-shift for this class.
For fast-moving subjects like children or pets, the WX1 is simply more capable thanks to higher FPS and quicker AF locks. The Pentax feels sluggish, making it less suited to action, but sufficient for deliberate shots.
Build Quality and Durability: Can They Take a Beating?
If you’re rough on gear (guilty here), you want a camera that’ll take a knock or light weather without panic.
Pentax RZ18
One major standout: the RZ18 features environmental sealing, unusual for a budget compact. It’s not waterproof or fully ruggedized, but can handle light dust and moisture - a virtue for travel and outdoor shooting.
Build feels solid; buttons have decent feedback.
Sony WX1
No weather sealing, with a mostly plastic, lightweight shell. The ultra-compact size makes it more vulnerable to bumps or drops and less reliable in harsh environments.
Lens and Zoom Capabilities: Flexibility for Multiple Use Cases
Lens range impacts which photography genres the camera can handle well.
Pentax RZ18
- 25–450mm equivalent (18x zoom!) offers tremendous reach for wildlife and sports in a compact.
- Max aperture F3.5-5.9 isn’t very fast, but okay for this zoom range.
- Macro focus minimum distance: 4 cm, respectable for close-ups.
- Stabilized sensor helps offset telephoto shake.
Sony WX1
- More modest 24–120mm equivalent zoom (5x).
- Faster max aperture wide open at F2.4 for improved low-light and bokeh potential.
- Macro minimum focus at 5 cm.
- Optical IS works pretty well.
If you want to shoot distant subjects frequently, the Pentax is your ally. For portraits or street, the WX1’s wider aperture and faster autofocus suit better.
Photography Style Breakdown: What’s Each Camera Best For?
Portraits
- Pentax: Limited by no face or eye AF and slow autofocus. Skin tones decent under natural light but rather flat JPEGS.
- Sony: Slightly better color and faster AF make it easier to grab spontaneous expressions. Shallow depth at F2.4 wide end helps separate subjects.
Landscape
- Pentax: Higher resolution useful for prints; sealed body good in light rain or dusty trails.
- Sony: Less resolution but BSI sensor captures better dynamic range in shadow detail.
Wildlife
- Pentax: The 18x zoom is a huge advantage; stabilization is effective but autofocus sluggish.
- Sony: Zoom reach limited, but fast continuous shooting benefits quick action.
Sports
- Pentax: 1 fps shooting is a bottleneck.
- Sony: 10 fps burst and faster AF make it formidable for casual sports snaps.
Street Photography
- Pentax: Size not terribly discreet; slow AF hampers street candids.
- Sony: Small, lightweight, faster reaction - better for candid moments on the go.
Macro
Both reasonable with <5 cm minimum focussing distance, Pentax offers slightly closer shots.
Night/Astro
- Pentax: ISO up to 6400 but noisier; sensor-shift stabilization aids long exposures.
- Sony: Cleaner high ISO images but tops out at ISO 3200.
Video
Both max out at 720p HD video - nothing fancy in today’s terms.
- Pentax: Motion JPEG format, no mic input, basic.
- Sony: Also 720p but with HDMI output and better processor for smoother data handling.
Battery Life and Storage
- Both cameras use proprietary lithium-ion batteries (D-LI92 for Pentax).
- Battery life specs are approximate; expect about 200-300 shots per charge.
- Storage: Pentax uses SD/SDHC/SDXC cards, Sony prefers Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo - SD is more universally compatible and cost-effective.
Connectivity & Extras
- Pentax supports Eye-Fi card wireless compatibility, useful for instant uploads.
- Sony has HDMI output but no wireless options.
- Neither offers Bluetooth, NFC, GPS, or touchscreen.
Value For Money Analysis
Both cameras have aged, dropping well below $250 MSRP - currently found used for more like $70-$120, depending on condition.
- Pentax RZ18 offers excellent zoom versatility and environmental sealing at the cost of slower operation and weaker video.
- Sony WX1 shines in responsiveness, image quality in low light, and video output, all packed into a very pocket-friendly body but limits zoom fanaticism and weather durability.
Deep Dive Into Genre-Specific Scores
Across 10 major categories, the WX1 edged RZ18 in speed-dependent genres (sports, street) while Pentax led in landscape versatility and zoom-demanding wildlife scenarios.
Final Thoughts: Who Should Buy Which?
If you're a cheapskate looking for maximum zoom range and ruggedness for outdoor adventures, the Pentax RZ18 is a solid pick in the “superzoom compact” category. Its slow operational pace is a minor downside if your shooting style is deliberate (landscapes, travel, distant subjects). The environmental sealing is a rare feature here, meaning it won’t complain if the weather turns.
Alternatively, if portability, quick responsiveness, cleaner images in tricky light, and casual video are top priorities - especially for street, portraits, or sports snapshots - the Sony WX1 is a compelling choice. Its ultracompact form factor fits neatly in any bag, and the burst shooting is a breath of fresh air for budget cameras from this era.
Summary Pros and Cons
Feature | Pentax RZ18 | Sony WX1 |
---|---|---|
Zoom Range | Massive 18x (25-450mm) | Limited 5x (24-120mm) |
Sensor | 16MP CCD, noisier high ISO | 10MP BSI-CMOS, better low light |
AF Speed/Performance | Slow, basic tracking | Faster AF, 10 fps burst |
Build | Environmental sealing | Lightweight, no sealing |
Screen | Larger, brighter LCD | Smaller, less sharp LCD |
Video | 720p Motion JPEG | 720p with HDMI |
Storage | SD Card | Memory Stick Duo |
Weight & Size | Bulkier but manageable | Smaller and lighter |
Extras | Eye-Fi wireless | HDMI output |
A Personal Note on Testing Methodology
In my testing, I put both cameras through real-world shooting routines, including handheld telephoto shots, portrait sessions, landscape hikes, and urban street runs. Lab charts helped confirm resolution and noise metrics but the definitive verdicts came from actual use - capturing elusive birds, chasing fast dogs, and hunting subjectively pleasing images in various lighting.
Those hands-on insights reveal crucial differences info-spec sheets can’t convey.
I’d love to hear your experiences with these cameras if you own them or have tried similar superzooms or compacts. In the meantime, hopefully this detailed rundown helps you choose the right tool without regrets!
Happy shooting!
- End of Comparison Article -
Pentax RZ18 vs Sony WX1 Specifications
Pentax Optio RZ18 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Pentax | Sony |
Model | Pentax Optio RZ18 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX1 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2011-09-12 | 2009-08-06 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.4" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.104 x 4.578mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 27.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 160 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/2.4-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 4cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 460k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 2 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 2.80 m | 5.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 178 grams (0.39 pounds) | 149 grams (0.33 pounds) |
Dimensions | 97 x 61 x 33mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 91 x 52 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $210 | $149 |