Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M1 II
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M1 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Launched October 2005
- Other Name is EVOLT E-500
- Renewed by Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Announced September 2016
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M1
- Later Model is Olympus E-M1 III
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M1 II Overview
Below is a in-depth review of the Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M1 II, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Pro Mirrorless and they are both sold by Olympus. There is a sizeable difference among the resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and E-M1 II (20MP) but they use the same exact sensor dimensions (Four Thirds).
Photography GlossaryThe E-500 was unveiled 12 years prior to the E-M1 II and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the E-500 scores vs the E-M1 II when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M1 II Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-500 and Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-500 Gallery and Olympus E-M1 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Olympus E-M1 II
| E-500 | E-M1 II |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus E-500
| E-M1 II | E-500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2016 |  | October 2005 | More recent by 132 months |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 1037k |  | 215k | Crisper screen (+822k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies | ||
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Olympus E-M1 II
| E-500 | E-M1 II | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focus |
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M1 II Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-500 comes with exterior dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") having a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-M1 II has sizing of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") and a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M1 II in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are using at that moment. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the E-500 versus the E-M1 II.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-500 and E-M1 II is 70 and 68 respectively.
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M1 II Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be hard to see the gap in sensor measurements only by checking out specifications. The photograph here will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-500 and E-M1 II.
Plainly, the 2 cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You should expect the Olympus E-M1 II to provide more detail having an extra 12 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The older E-500 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M1 II Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M1 II Specifications
| Olympus E-500 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus E-500 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II |
| Alternate name | EVOLT E-500 | - |
| Class | Advanced DSLR | Pro Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2005-10-21 | 2016-09-19 |
| Physical type | Mid-size SLR | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic VIII |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 226.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
| Peak resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Highest native ISO | 400 | 25600 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Min enhanced ISO | - | 64 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | 121 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
| Number of lenses | 45 | 107 |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Screen sizing | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 215k dots | 1,037k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | 0.74x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/8000s |
| Max silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 60.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | 1/180s | 1/250s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | None | 4096x2160 |
| Video format | - | MOV, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 479 gr (1.06 lb) | 574 gr (1.27 lb) |
| Dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 80 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.8 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1312 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 photos |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | BLH-1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots |
| Card slots | One | 2 |
| Pricing at release | $600 | $1,700 |