Pentax S1 vs Sony WX350
93 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34
94 Imaging
42 Features
43 Overall
42
Pentax S1 vs Sony WX350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 157g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Announced March 2011
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.5) lens
- 164g - 96 x 55 x 26mm
- Launched February 2014
- Earlier Model is Sony WX300
- Renewed by Sony WX500
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Pentax Optio S1 vs Sony Cyber-shot WX350: The Compact Showdown from Practical Lenses to Performance
In the world of compact cameras, the notion of “small but mighty” often comes with some hefty asterisks. Choosing the right compact camera can feel like threading a very narrow needle - balancing size, zoom capability, image quality, and ease of use with a budget-conscious mindset. Today, we're going to carefully unpack two noteworthy contenders, the Pentax Optio S1 and the Sony Cyber-shot WX350 - both classic compacts in their own right, yet designed with rather different priorities. Having spent considerable time with both, I’ll share an in-depth comparative analysis addressing everything from sensor tech to everyday shooting nuances, capturing what really matters for real-world photographers.
Before diving into the nitty-gritty, let’s set some expectations: neither camera targets professional-grade specs, but each can serve specific user profiles well - and knowing their strengths and limitations helps you avoid disappointment. So, let’s start with their physical presence and ergonomics, setting a foundation for how these cameras feel in hand and interact with you.
How Big Is Your Pocket? Comparing Size and Ergonomics
Picking up a camera - especially a compact - should feel comfortable and intuitive, like a natural extension of your hand during a spontaneous shoot. From personal experience, the handling experience shapes not just enjoyment but shooting effectiveness. Here’s where the Pentax S1 and Sony WX350 start to diverge.

The Pentax S1 is a bit on the chunkier side for a compact, measuring 114×58×28mm and weighing 157g. Its larger size is partly due to the 5x zoom lens (28-140mm equivalent) and sensor-shift image stabilization mechanism tucked inside. It offers a straightforward grip but can feel a touch blocky in smaller hands or when tucked in tight pockets.
In contrast, the Sony WX350 measures a more pocket-friendly 96×55×26mm and tips the scales slightly heavier at 164g, squeezed into a sleeker, classically slim superzoom profile with a 20x zoom (25-500mm equivalent). The WX350 balances extended telephoto capability with surprisingly compact ergonomics, though the small profile can mean some control buttons are a bit fiddly for those with larger fingers.
Ergonomically, neither camera boasts dials for manual exposure tweaks - both are largely point-and-shoot simplicity machines. However, the S1 edges ahead for approachable button placement and a slightly more confident feel in hand, which might matter if you shoot for prolonged stretches.
At a Glance: Control Layout and User Interface
Navigating the camera’s controls is a subtle art, especially when your shooting time is limited to split seconds. In my testing, intuitive button layouts made the Sony WX350 surprisingly responsive, but the Pentax’s simplicity shone through for effortless casual use.

On the top deck, the Sony WX350 integrates a power button, shutter release, zoom toggle, and a mini mode dial that’s both minimal and functional. The Pentax S1 keeps things barebones - mainly just a shutter release and power button - reinforcing its budget-friendly, straightforward nature.
Neither camera offers a touchscreen display, which in 2014 (Sony) and 2011 (Pentax) was less expected but now feels a bit dated. Both feature fixed LCD screens - more on those moments from behind the camera in the next section.
Peering Through Pixels: Sensor Tech and Image Quality
Ah, the sensor - the beating heart of any digital camera. It decides how much detail, color fidelity, and dynamic range your photos will have. Both models feature the standard 1/2.3-inch sensor size typical of pocket compacts, but with different sensor technologies that significantly impact output.

Pentax Optio S1: Uses a 14MP CCD sensor. While CCD sensors excel at color reproduction and often produce pleasant tone gradations, they're generally less sensitive to light than CMOS-based sensors and typically consume more power. Also, in 2011, CCDs were increasingly viewed as less versatile under low-light conditions.
Sony WX350: Upgrades to an 18MP BSI-CMOS sensor, leveraging back-side illumination technology that improves light gathering efficiency. This tech often translates into better high-ISO performance - a boon in dim environments or fast-action shooting where faster shutter speeds are necessary.
Resolution-wise, the Sony's higher pixel count (18MP vs 14MP) and newer sensor technology generally yield sharper, cleaner images with finer details, particularly noticeable when shooting landscapes or prints larger than 8x10 inches.
From practical experience, the WX350’s photos retain more highlight and shadow details, offering slightly better dynamic range - although the small sensor size inherently limits this compared to larger-sensor models. The Pentax S1 produces respectable colors but shows more noise (grain) at ISO settings above 400.
Viewing and Framing: LCD Screen and Interface Impressions
When you're composing without a viewfinder, the LCD screen becomes your window to the world - so clarity and responsiveness matter.

The Pentax S1’s 2.7-inch, 230k-dot TFT LCD is serviceable but dimmer and less crisp, which means struggling in bright sunlight might be a regular frustration. Its anti-reflective coating helps, but overall, it feels quite basic - acceptable once you become accustomed to it, but limiting.
The Sony WX350 offers a 3-inch LCD with double the resolution at 460k dots, delivering a noticeably sharper image preview. Even under moderate ambient light, its brighter and clearer display made manual framing easier, and videos looked well defined on the screen.
Neither camera offers a viewfinder - electronic or optical - limiting flexibility in harsh light or action situations. Sony’s lack of touchscreen hinders quick focus point selection or setting changes, something the Pentax shares.
For casual shooters focusing on simple compositions, these LCDs suffice. But for enthusiasts or those who like precise framing, be prepared to adapt.
Shooting Styles Examined: Who Suits Which Genres?
Let’s pivot to some field tests. How do these compacts perform across various photography disciplines? I put both through their paces - note, their capabilities are modest, but understanding their niches reveals where they excel or fall short.
Portrait Photography: Skin Tones and Bokeh Dreams
Portraits are all about pleasing skin tones, sharp eyes, and ideally, nice background separation (bokeh). With tiny sensors and fixed lens apertures, both cameras struggle to deliver creamy backgrounds, but nuances matter.
-
Pentax S1: Offers a max aperture range of f/3.5 (wide) to f/5.5 (telephoto), with a 5x zoom starting at 28mm, giving some room for environmental portraits. However, limited aperture and sensor size result in fairly deep depth of field, making background blur modest at best. Skin tones rendered warmly but occasionally looked a bit flat under mixed lighting, a common CCD characteristic.
-
Sony WX350: A 20x superzoom ranging from 25–500mm at f/3.5–6.5 provides impressive telephoto reach for tight headshots from a distance. The BSI CMOS sensor helps maintain color fidelity and sharpness on eyes, and face-detection autofocus (absent on the Pentax) contributed to reliable focus lock on faces, a nifty feature for quick portraits. However, depth of field remains broad, curtailing bokeh effects.
In sum, the WX350 shines for portraits requiring telephoto compression and focus reliability, whereas the Pentax feels more limited but fine for casual snapshots.
Landscape Photography: Dynamic Range and Resolution
Landscape images thrive on rich detail, wide dynamic range, and ability to recover shadows without noisy artifacts.
The Sony WX350’s modern sensor edge gives it a leg up - higher native ISO options (up to 12800 vs. 6400) and higher resolution translate to more detailed files. The Pentax’s limited ISO ceiling and older CCD sensor make it stickier in low light or high contrast scenes.
Neither model features weather sealing, a notable downside if you shoot outdoors in unpredictable conditions. Also, their lenses don’t have ultra-wide focal lengths (the Pentax starts at 28mm, Sony 25mm), a reasonable compromise for pocketability.
For landscapes, WX350 delivers sharper, more vibrant images with less post-processing needed, albeit neither camera approaches the quality from dedicated enthusiast or prosumer gear.
Wildlife and Sports Photography: Speed and Autofocus
Shooting moving subjects tests autofocus responsiveness and burst burst shooting speed.
-
The Pentax S1 caps continuous shooting at a snail’s pace of 1 fps and lacks face detection or advanced tracking - a serious drawback for wildlife or sports. Its contrast-detection autofocus with nine focus points feels sluggish and hesitant.
-
The Sony WX350 trips up less here - a 10 fps burst rate and face detection help capture fleeting moments. The autofocus system is still contrast-detection based (no phase detection), but with multi-area focus options and better accuracy, particularly at telephoto lengths, thanks to its lens technology.
If you’re chasing birds or kids at play, Sony is clearly better suited, though keep expectations reasonable given compact class limitations.
Street Photography: Portability and Discreteness
Street shooters cherish light, quick, and inconspicuous cameras.
In this arena, Sony’s smaller 96×55×26mm body makes it easier to carry inconspicuously. The Pentax’s chunkier shape and slower operation means missed candid moments.
Both cameras lack viewfinders, which can be a dealbreaker for some street photographers who dislike holding their LCD out in public. Still, if you embrace the LCD approach, both suffice for casual urban snaps.
Macro and Close-Up Work
Pentax’s 1cm macro focusing distance is quite competitive - great for flower and detail shots close-up. The sensor-shift stabilization helps reduce blur when hand-holding near subjects.
Sony doesn’t specify macro range, with minimum focusing distances noticeably longer, making close-focus harder. However, its image stabilization also counters handshake well.
If close-up shooting is key, the Pentax scores a niche advantage here.
Night and Astro Photography
Both cameras struggle here due to small sensor size and limited ISO scaling - Pentax tops out at ISO6400 and Sony at ISO12800, but noise becomes a problem past ISO800 practically.
The Sony’s BSI-CMOS sensor maintains cleaner images at higher ISO settings with basic noise reduction, useful under low skies.
Neither camera offers bulb exposures or dedicated astro modes, so long-exposure star shots aren’t their forte.
Video and Multimedia
Sony takes the win - offering Full HD 1080p video at 60i with AVCHD format, an advantage for sharper, smoother video clips.
Pentax caps out at 720p HD recording with Motion JPEG, which yields larger files with less compression efficiency and lower image quality.
Audio inputs are absent on both, limiting external microphone use. Optical stabilization on Sony also improves handheld video steadiness compared to Pentax’s sensor-shift system.
Travel and Everyday Use
Weight differences are small (157g vs 164g), but the Sony WX350’s smaller footprint, longer zoom, and more powerful battery (470 shots vs 260 shots estimated) make it a better travel companion for extended outings without charging worries.
Pentax’s fewer wireless capabilities (none) contrast with Sony’s built-in wireless transfer - handy for quick sharing via smartphone apps, a factor worth noting for social-media minded travelers.
Building Quality and Toughness: Will They Survive Your Adventures?
Both lack environmental sealing (water, dust, shockproofing), so neither is ideal for rugged outdoor use.

The build quality is typical compact plastic, with Sony's body feeling a touch more refined and resistant to wear over months of use.
Battery, Storage, and Connectivity
Sony WX350’s battery life nearly doubles Pentax’s - a huge practical advantage for daylong shoots when charging options are scarce.
Sony supports both SD and Memory Stick cards, increasing flexibility; Pentax is SD-only.
Connectivity-wise, only the Sony sports Wi-Fi for wireless image transfer and remote control - a modern convenience missing in the older Pentax design.
Overall Performance and Ratings
Each camera holds its own in specific niches, but the Sony WX350 edges ahead as a more versatile and powerful compact.
Sony's strengths lie in zoom reach, sensor tech, burst speed, video quality, and battery longevity, resulting in higher aggregated scores on tests I've conducted and referenced.
Pentax S1 remains appealing for ultra-budget buyers or those wanting a simple pocket camera with decent image stabilization and macro ability.
Across Photography Types: Detailed Genre Scores
- Portrait: Sony WX350 scores higher for focus and color fidelity.
- Landscape: Sony leads with detail retention and dynamic range.
- Wildlife: Sony’s burst rate and autofocus trump Pentax.
- Sports: Both limited, Sony still better.
- Street: Sony’s compactness and focus assist wins.
- Macro: Pentax’s 1cm macro edge balances this.
- Night: Sony’s high ISO advantage dominates.
- Video: Sony Far Superior.
- Travel: Sony’s battery life and zoom range shine.
- Professional Use: Neither aimed at pros; Sony’s file flexibility edges ahead.
Real-Life Gallery: Images to Judge with Your Own Eyes
Enough talk - let's contrast sample images from both cameras under similar conditions to spot qualitative differences.
Notice the Sony WX350’s crisper details, richer colors, and better noise handling in shadows, evident especially in telephoto shots. The Pentax S1 yields softer, warmer tones but lags in edge sharpness and low light clarity.
Summing It Up: Which Compact is Right for You?
Pentax Optio S1: Best if you're on a tight budget and want a simple, reliable compact with good macro capability and basic image stabilization. Ideal for casual shooters who value ease over specs. That 1cm macro focus range is a standout feature in this price segment.
Sony Cyber-shot WX350: A stronger, more versatile camera with a massive 20x zoom, superior sensor and processor tech, better battery life, and much improved video specs. Perfect for enthusiasts who want a true travel compact capable of handling a wider range of photography genres with decent image quality and flexibility.
If I had to pick one for a friend seeking a no-fuss all-rounder today, I'd point them to the Sony WX350 - it feels like a camera designed with more thoughtful compromises for the modern shooter. But if your primary need is snapshot simplicity and budget-bound macro fun, the Pentax S1 still holds charm.
Parting Thoughts
While these cameras won't replace a mirrorless or DSLR in any pro setup, their compactness combined with focused feature sets can shine in the right hands. My testing reinforced that understanding your priorities - zoom reach versus simplified control, video needs versus stills, portability versus ergonomics - guides you better than marketing buzz.
And as always: the best camera is the one you enjoy using, and that helps you tell your story through images.
Happy shooting!
Pentax S1 vs Sony WX350 Specifications
| Pentax Optio S1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX350 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Pentax | Sony |
| Model type | Pentax Optio S1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX350 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2011-03-02 | 2014-02-13 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-500mm (20.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.5-6.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.90 m | 4.30 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | VCHD: 28M PS(1,920x1,080/60p) / 24M FX(1,920x1,080/60i) / 17M FH(1,920x1,080/60i),MP4: 12M(1,440x1,080/30fps) / 3M VGA(640x480/30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 157 gr (0.35 lb) | 164 gr (0.36 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 96 x 55 x 26mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 260 photographs | 470 photographs |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | NP-BX1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (Off / 10sec. / 2sec. / portrait1 / portrait2) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $174 | $270 |