Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Pentax Q-S1
93 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/63bd5/63bd549202ff236b9bc86cddba608e6a029457e0" alt="Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS front Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dd627/dd6277e99ef9f564cea30d5ecbfa8cecd5214610" alt="Pentax Q-S1 front Pentax Q-S1 front"
92 Imaging
38 Features
54 Overall
44
Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Pentax Q-S1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 167g - 116 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced August 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax Q Mount
- 203g - 105 x 58 x 34mm
- Introduced August 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Pentax Q-S1 Overview
In this article, we will be analyzing the Pentax WG-1 GPS versus Pentax Q-S1, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and both of them are created by Pentax. The image resolution of the WG-1 GPS (14MP) and the Q-S1 (12MP) is pretty comparable but the WG-1 GPS (1/2.3") and Q-S1 (1/1.7") use totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The WG-1 GPS was brought out 4 years earlier than the Q-S1 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Pentax WG-1 GPS being a Compact camera and the Pentax Q-S1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going through a more detailed comparison, below is a simple view of how the WG-1 GPS scores versus the Q-S1 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Pentax Q-S1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS and Pentax Q-S1. The entire galleries are viewable at Pentax WG-1 GPS Gallery and Pentax Q-S1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-1 GPS over the Pentax Q-S1
WG-1 GPS | Q-S1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax Q-S1 over the Pentax WG-1 GPS
Q-S1 | WG-1 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2014 | ![]() | August 2011 | More recent by 36 months |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Pentax WG-1 GPS and Pentax Q-S1
WG-1 GPS | Q-S1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Absent Touch screen |
Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Pentax Q-S1 Physical Comparison
When you are going to lug around your camera often, you should take into account its weight and volume. The Pentax WG-1 GPS has got outer measurements of 116mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs) while the Pentax Q-S1 has sizing of 105mm x 58mm x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of 203 grams (0.45 lbs).
Examine the Pentax WG-1 GPS versus Pentax Q-S1 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have at the time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the WG-1 GPS against the Q-S1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b4697/b46976b41ece9a5e2ba5ceda8370468c7f69310f" alt="Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Pentax Q-S1 size comparison Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Pentax Q-S1 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-1 GPS and Q-S1 is 93 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8486d/8486d264a165c26e386b4b54b629d65b9a8a63a1" alt="Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Pentax Q-S1 top view buttons comparison Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Pentax Q-S1 top view buttons comparison"
Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Pentax Q-S1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to see the gap in sensor measurements merely by going through specifications. The visual underneath will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-1 GPS and Q-S1.
To sum up, both of these cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The WG-1 GPS because of its smaller sensor will make achieving shallow DOF trickier and the Pentax WG-1 GPS will produce more detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The older WG-1 GPS will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26d7c/26d7c6b26830b25f268f8a9082e2c053ef1f4fda" alt="Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Pentax Q-S1 sensor size comparison Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Pentax Q-S1 sensor size comparison"
Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/717c6/717c62e2a9c375b334a0858a4ada4a9edf5f9806" alt="Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Pentax Q-S1 Specifications
Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS | Pentax Q-S1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Pentax | Pentax |
Model | Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS | Pentax Q-S1 |
Category | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2011-08-16 | 2014-08-04 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Q Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Pentax Q |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 8 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.90 m | 4.90 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, trailing curtain sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30,25, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30, 25, 24p), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 167 grams (0.37 lb) | 203 grams (0.45 lb) |
Dimensions | 116 x 59 x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 105 x 58 x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 260 pictures | 250 pictures |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | D-LI92 | D-LI68 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $350 | $250 |