Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Ricoh CX2
93 Imaging
36 Features
31 Overall
34
93 Imaging
31 Features
35 Overall
32
Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Ricoh CX2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 167g - 116 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched August 2011
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched August 2009
Photography Glossary Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Ricoh CX2 Overview
Following is a detailed assessment of the Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Ricoh CX2, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Pentax and Ricoh. There exists a sizable gap between the sensor resolutions of the WG-1 GPS (14MP) and CX2 (9MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe WG-1 GPS was released 2 years after the CX2 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a short highlight of how the WG-1 GPS grades vs the CX2 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Ricoh CX2 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS & Ricoh CX2. The complete galleries are available at Pentax WG-1 GPS Gallery & Ricoh CX2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-1 GPS over the Ricoh CX2
| WG-1 GPS | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | August 2011 |  | August 2009 | More modern by 25 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Pentax WG-1 GPS
| CX2 | WG-1 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Pentax WG-1 GPS and Ricoh CX2
| WG-1 GPS | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither includes Touch display |
Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Ricoh CX2 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera often, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Pentax WG-1 GPS features outside measurements of 116mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs) while the Ricoh CX2 has proportions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs).
Look at the Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Ricoh CX2 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the WG-1 GPS compared to the CX2.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-1 GPS and CX2 is 93 and 93 respectively.
Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Ricoh CX2 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is tough to imagine the gap between sensor sizes only by reading through technical specs. The image underneath should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-1 GPS and CX2.
As you can tell, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Pentax WG-1 GPS to give you more detail as a result of its extra 5MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more modern WG-1 GPS provides a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Ricoh CX2 Specifications
| Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS | Ricoh CX2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Pentax | Ricoh |
| Model | Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS | Ricoh CX2 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2011-08-16 | 2009-08-20 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 9MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.90 m | 3.00 m (ISO 400) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 167 gr (0.37 lb) | 185 gr (0.41 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 116 x 59 x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 260 photos | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | DB-70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $350 | $341 |