Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Ricoh WG-M1
93 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 167g - 116 x 59 x 29mm
- Released August 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Revealed September 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
The following is a complete analysis of the Pentax WG-1 GPS versus Ricoh WG-M1, both Waterproof cameras by competitors Pentax and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the WG-1 GPS (14MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras have the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe WG-1 GPS was manufactured 4 years earlier than the WG-M1 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a complete comparison, here is a quick view of how the WG-1 GPS scores versus the WG-M1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS and Ricoh WG-M1. The entire galleries are viewable at Pentax WG-1 GPS Gallery and Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-1 GPS over the Ricoh WG-M1
| WG-1 GPS | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.2") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Sharper screen (+115k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Pentax WG-1 GPS
| WG-M1 | WG-1 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2014 |  | August 2011 | Newer by 37 months |
Common features in the Pentax WG-1 GPS and Ricoh WG-M1
| WG-1 GPS | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to think about its weight and proportions. The Pentax WG-1 GPS provides external measurements of 116mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-M1 has measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Compare the Pentax WG-1 GPS versus Ricoh WG-M1 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have at that moment. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the WG-1 GPS versus the WG-M1.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-1 GPS and WG-M1 is 93 and 91 respectively.
Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is hard to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions merely by seeing a spec sheet. The picture underneath will give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-1 GPS and WG-M1.
Clearly, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the identical MP therefore you should expect comparable quality of photos however you should always consider the production date of the cameras into account. The more aged WG-1 GPS will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Pentax | Ricoh |
| Model type | Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Class | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Released | 2011-08-16 | 2014-09-12 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | (1×) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" | 1.5" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 115 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | - |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.90 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 167 gr (0.37 lb) | 190 gr (0.42 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 116 x 59 x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 260 photographs | 350 photographs |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $350 | $2,000 |