Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Samsung SL102
93 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34
96 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27
Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 167g - 116 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced August 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
- Other Name is ES55
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Below, we will be evaluating the Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Samsung SL102, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Pentax and Samsung. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the WG-1 GPS (14MP) and SL102 (10MP) but they use the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe WG-1 GPS was brought out 2 years later than the SL102 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the WG-1 GPS matches up vs the SL102 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS and Samsung SL102. The entire galleries are available at Pentax WG-1 GPS Gallery and Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-1 GPS over the Samsung SL102
| WG-1 GPS | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | August 2011 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 32 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Screen dimension | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Pentax WG-1 GPS
| SL102 | WG-1 GPS |
|---|
Common features in the Pentax WG-1 GPS and Samsung SL102
| WG-1 GPS | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to factor its weight and volume. The Pentax WG-1 GPS comes with exterior measurements of 116mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL102 has sizing of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Check out the Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Samsung SL102 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have during that time. Following is the front view size comparison of the WG-1 GPS compared to the SL102.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-1 GPS and SL102 is 93 and 96 respectively.
Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very tough to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements simply by viewing a spec sheet. The graphic underneath should give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-1 GPS and SL102.
Clearly, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Pentax WG-1 GPS to provide you with more detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The younger WG-1 GPS will have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Pentax | Samsung |
| Model type | Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS | Samsung SL102 |
| Also called | - | ES55 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2011-08-16 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.90 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 167 gr (0.37 lb) | 116 gr (0.26 lb) |
| Dimensions | 116 x 59 x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 260 pictures | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $350 | $130 |