Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Sony S2000
93 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34
93 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Sony S2000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 167g - 116 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced August 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-105mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 167g - 98 x 61 x 27mm
- Announced January 2010
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Sony S2000 Overview
Lets look much closer at the Pentax WG-1 GPS versus Sony S2000, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Pentax and Sony. There is a sizeable difference among the resolutions of the WG-1 GPS (14MP) and S2000 (10MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe WG-1 GPS was revealed 20 months after the S2000 making the cameras a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the WG-1 GPS scores vs the S2000 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Sony S2000 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000. The full galleries are viewable at Pentax WG-1 GPS Gallery and Sony S2000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-1 GPS over the Sony S2000
| WG-1 GPS | S2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | August 2011 |  | January 2010 | Newer by 20 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Sony S2000 over the Pentax WG-1 GPS
| S2000 | WG-1 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Pentax WG-1 GPS and Sony S2000
| WG-1 GPS | S2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Sony S2000 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera often, you're going to have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Pentax WG-1 GPS enjoys exterior measurements of 116mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs) whilst the Sony S2000 has measurements of 98mm x 61mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Analyze the Pentax WG-1 GPS versus Sony S2000 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the WG-1 GPS vs the S2000.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the WG-1 GPS and S2000 is 93 and 93 respectively.
Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Sony S2000 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's tough to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions purely by checking out a spec sheet. The image underneath may offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-1 GPS and S2000.
Clearly, both the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You should expect to see the Pentax WG-1 GPS to show greater detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics much more aggressively. The newer WG-1 GPS provides an advantage in sensor innovation.
Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Sony S2000 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Sony S2000 Specifications
| Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Pentax | Sony |
| Model | Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2011-08-16 | 2010-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 33-105mm (3.2x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.1-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 1 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | 1/1200 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.90 m | 3.30 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 167g (0.37 pounds) | 167g (0.37 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 116 x 59 x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 98 x 61 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 260 photographs | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, optional SD, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $350 | $225 |