Pentax WG-1 vs Samsung WB35F
93 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f030/9f03013b4b6e229689ea100f87aa37abcbac60f6" alt="Pentax Optio WG-1 front Pentax Optio WG-1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52f91/52f9140fa7006285dc43ba7d1f1fb45d41f5684b" alt="Samsung WB35F front Samsung WB35F front"
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Pentax WG-1 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 157g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Introduced February 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Launched January 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Pentax WG-1 vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Let's look a bit more in depth at the Pentax WG-1 vs Samsung WB35F, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Pentax and Samsung. The image resolution of the WG-1 (14MP) and the WB35F (16MP) is relatively comparable and they feature the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The WG-1 was brought out 3 years earlier than the WB35F and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a in depth comparison, below is a quick overview of how the WG-1 matches up versus the WB35F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Pentax WG-1 vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Pentax Optio WG-1 and Samsung WB35F. The entire galleries are provided at Pentax WG-1 Gallery and Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-1 over the Samsung WB35F
WG-1 | WB35F |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Pentax WG-1
WB35F | WG-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2014 | ![]() | February 2011 | More recent by 35 months |
Common features in the Pentax WG-1 and Samsung WB35F
WG-1 | WB35F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Identical screen measurement |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Pentax WG-1 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
If you are going to lug around your camera often, you are going to need to think about its weight and measurements. The Pentax WG-1 has got outer measurements of 114mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 157 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Samsung WB35F has proportions of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Contrast the Pentax WG-1 vs Samsung WB35F in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you choose at that moment. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the WG-1 and the WB35F.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a677a/a677a89360f60e06eb2c18169497a4364852e3b7" alt="Pentax WG-1 vs Samsung WB35F size comparison Pentax WG-1 vs Samsung WB35F size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the WG-1 and WB35F is 93 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/497da/497da4bfd571b67fa301387e2981523ceffc18cb" alt="Pentax WG-1 vs Samsung WB35F top view buttons comparison Pentax WG-1 vs Samsung WB35F top view buttons comparison"
Pentax WG-1 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to picture the gap in sensor measurements purely by going through a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-1 and WB35F.
As you can see, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Samsung WB35F to provide more detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The older WG-1 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1adac/1adac676eb7f6142ce70c97875fb468bc3220d3c" alt="Pentax WG-1 vs Samsung WB35F sensor size comparison Pentax WG-1 vs Samsung WB35F sensor size comparison"
Pentax WG-1 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d7d5/1d7d50d6a60db82f6c833d9e8ca48e55f6795844" alt="Pentax WG-1 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Pentax WG-1 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Pentax WG-1 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
Pentax Optio WG-1 | Samsung WB35F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Pentax | Samsung |
Model | Pentax Optio WG-1 | Samsung WB35F |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2011-02-07 | 2014-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.1-6.3 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.90 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 157 grams (0.35 pounds) | 194 grams (0.43 pounds) |
Dimensions | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 260 pictures | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | BP70A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $350 | $130 |