Pentax WG-1 vs Sony H200
93 Imaging
36 Features
31 Overall
34
67 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
Pentax WG-1 vs Sony H200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 157g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Revealed February 2011
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-633mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 530g - 123 x 83 x 87mm
- Revealed January 2013
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Pentax WG-1 vs Sony H200 Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Pentax WG-1 and Sony H200, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Pentax and Sony. There exists a sizeable gap between the image resolutions of the WG-1 (14MP) and H200 (20MP) but they feature the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe WG-1 was introduced 23 months before the H200 making the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Pentax WG-1 being a Compact camera and the Sony H200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the WG-1 scores vs the H200 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Pentax WG-1 vs Sony H200 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Pentax Optio WG-1 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200. The whole galleries are viewable at Pentax WG-1 Gallery and Sony H200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-1 over the Sony H200
| WG-1 | H200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Sony H200 over the Pentax WG-1
| H200 | WG-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 | February 2011 | More modern by 23 months | |
| Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Pentax WG-1 and Sony H200
| WG-1 | H200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Missing Touch friendly display |
Pentax WG-1 vs Sony H200 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera frequently, you have to take into account its weight and volume. The Pentax WG-1 has got exterior measurements of 114mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 157 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Sony H200 has sizing of 123mm x 83mm x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") accompanied by a weight of 530 grams (1.17 lbs).
See the Pentax WG-1 and Sony H200 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have at that moment. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the WG-1 and the H200.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-1 and H200 is 93 and 67 respectively.
Pentax WG-1 vs Sony H200 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's tough to imagine the difference between sensor sizes purely by reviewing a spec sheet. The picture underneath will give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-1 and H200.
As you can see, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You should anticipate the Sony H200 to offer you greater detail using its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more aged WG-1 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Pentax WG-1 vs Sony H200 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Pentax WG-1 vs Sony H200 Specifications
| Pentax Optio WG-1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Pentax | Sony |
| Model | Pentax Optio WG-1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2011-02-07 | 2013-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 20MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5184 x 2920 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-633mm (26.4x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.1-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 20cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating | ClearPhoto LCD display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.90 m | 6.80 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Advanced Flash |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 157 gr (0.35 lb) | 530 gr (1.17 lb) |
| Dimensions | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 123 x 83 x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 260 photos | 240 photos |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | AA |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $350 | $250 |