Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Pentax Q-S1
91 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1b1a/c1b1aca5a367ce52d585dfa9c9ef670048d691fe" alt="Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS front Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dd627/dd6277e99ef9f564cea30d5ecbfa8cecd5214610" alt="Pentax Q-S1 front Pentax Q-S1 front"
92 Imaging
38 Features
54 Overall
44
Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Pentax Q-S1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 198g - 122 x 61 x 30mm
- Introduced February 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax Q Mount
- 203g - 105 x 58 x 34mm
- Launched August 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Pentax Q-S1 Overview
Here, we will be reviewing the Pentax WG-2 GPS versus Pentax Q-S1, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and they are both offered by Pentax. There is a substantial difference among the resolutions of the WG-2 GPS (16MP) and Q-S1 (12MP) and the WG-2 GPS (1/2.3") and Q-S1 (1/1.7") offer totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The WG-2 GPS was launched 3 years earlier than the Q-S1 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Pentax WG-2 GPS being a Compact camera and the Pentax Q-S1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting right into a detailed comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the WG-2 GPS scores versus the Q-S1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Pentax Q-S1 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS & Pentax Q-S1. The complete galleries are viewable at Pentax WG-2 GPS Gallery & Pentax Q-S1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-2 GPS over the Pentax Q-S1
WG-2 GPS | Q-S1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax Q-S1 over the Pentax WG-2 GPS
Q-S1 | WG-2 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2014 | ![]() | February 2012 | More modern by 30 months |
Common features in the Pentax WG-2 GPS and Pentax Q-S1
WG-2 GPS | Q-S1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen sizing |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | The same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Pentax Q-S1 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and proportions. The Pentax WG-2 GPS comes with outside measurements of 122mm x 61mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 198 grams (0.44 lbs) and the Pentax Q-S1 has measurements of 105mm x 58mm x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 203 grams (0.45 lbs).
Contrast the Pentax WG-2 GPS versus Pentax Q-S1 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are using during that time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the WG-2 GPS vs the Q-S1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0288c/0288c9e54249d4e7a26deb92104f8474c08652da" alt="Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Pentax Q-S1 size comparison Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Pentax Q-S1 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability score of the WG-2 GPS and Q-S1 is 91 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1975/c1975001feeea7a8be32f9e019cf676c44d2f879" alt="Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Pentax Q-S1 top view buttons comparison Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Pentax Q-S1 top view buttons comparison"
Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Pentax Q-S1 Sensor Comparison
Often, its hard to visualise the gap in sensor sizes purely by checking out specs. The pic here will provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-2 GPS and Q-S1.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The WG-2 GPS due to its smaller sensor will make getting bokeh harder and the Pentax WG-2 GPS will provide extra detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The more aged WG-2 GPS will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d817b/d817b64ca2988824d18f2674c454308f4fa99a30" alt="Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Pentax Q-S1 sensor size comparison Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Pentax Q-S1 sensor size comparison"
Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b8849/b8849d52030def9a4b0d4853cc47758364c8339a" alt="Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Pentax Q-S1 Specifications
Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS | Pentax Q-S1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Pentax | Pentax |
Model type | Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS | Pentax Q-S1 |
Type | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2012-02-07 | 2014-08-04 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Q Engine |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Pentax Q |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 8 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.40 m | 4.90 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, trailing curtain sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30,25, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30, 25, 24p), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24p) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 198 grams (0.44 lb) | 203 grams (0.45 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 61 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 105 x 58 x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 260 photos | 250 photos |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | D-LI68 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $300 | $250 |