Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Ricoh CX1
91 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
93 Imaging
32 Features
30 Overall
31
Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Ricoh CX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 198g - 122 x 61 x 30mm
- Released February 2012
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Introduced February 2009
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Ricoh CX1 Overview
Lets look closer at the Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Ricoh CX1, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Pentax and Ricoh. There is a significant difference among the resolutions of the WG-2 GPS (16MP) and CX1 (9MP) but they possess the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe WG-2 GPS was introduced 3 years after the CX1 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a in depth comparison, below is a quick summation of how the WG-2 GPS grades against the CX1 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Ricoh CX1 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS and Ricoh CX1. The whole galleries are available at Pentax WG-2 GPS Gallery and Ricoh CX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-2 GPS over the Ricoh CX1
| WG-2 GPS | CX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2012 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 37 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Pentax WG-2 GPS
| CX1 | WG-2 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Pentax WG-2 GPS and Ricoh CX1
| WG-2 GPS | CX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither has Touch screen |
Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Ricoh CX1 Physical Comparison
If you're going to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to factor its weight and size. The Pentax WG-2 GPS has outside measurements of 122mm x 61mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 198 grams (0.44 lbs) while the Ricoh CX1 has specifications of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs).
Analyze the Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Ricoh CX1 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the WG-2 GPS vs the CX1.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-2 GPS and CX1 is 91 and 93 respectively.
Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Ricoh CX1 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be difficult to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions just by going through specifications. The picture underneath may offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-2 GPS and CX1.
To sum up, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Pentax WG-2 GPS to show greater detail using its extra 7MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more recent WG-2 GPS will have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Ricoh CX1 Specifications
| Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS | Ricoh CX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Pentax | Ricoh |
| Model | Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS | Ricoh CX1 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2012-02-07 | 2009-02-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 9 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-200mm (7.1x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.3-5.2 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.40 m | 3.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 198 grams (0.44 lbs) | 180 grams (0.40 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 61 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 260 photos | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | DB-70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $300 | $299 |