Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Ricoh WG-50
91 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
91 Imaging
41 Features
39 Overall
40
Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 198g - 122 x 61 x 30mm
- Released February 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed May 2017
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview
Below is a detailed comparison of the Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Ricoh WG-50, both Waterproof digital cameras by companies Pentax and Ricoh. The image resolution of the WG-2 GPS (16MP) and the WG-50 (16MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras posses the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe WG-2 GPS was manufactured 6 years prior to the WG-50 and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a short view of how the WG-2 GPS matches up against the WG-50 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Ricoh WG-50 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS and Ricoh WG-50. The entire galleries are available at Pentax WG-2 GPS Gallery and Ricoh WG-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-2 GPS over the Ricoh WG-50
| WG-2 GPS | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Pentax WG-2 GPS
| WG-50 | WG-2 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | May 2017 | February 2012 | More recent by 64 months |
Common features in the Pentax WG-2 GPS and Ricoh WG-50
| WG-2 GPS | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial precise focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither offers Touch screen |
Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera, you need to consider its weight and volume. The Pentax WG-2 GPS offers outer dimensions of 122mm x 61mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 198 grams (0.44 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-50 has sizing of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Analyze the Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Ricoh WG-50 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the WG-2 GPS versus the WG-50.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-2 GPS and WG-50 is 91 and 91 respectively.
Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very hard to picture the difference between sensor measurements just by looking at technical specs. The graphic underneath will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-2 GPS and WG-50.
As you have seen, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the identical resolution therefore you should expect similar quality of images however you should always consider the release date of the products into consideration. The older WG-2 GPS is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications
| Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS | Ricoh WG-50 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Pentax | Ricoh |
| Model | Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS | Ricoh WG-50 |
| Type | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Released | 2012-02-07 | 2017-05-24 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per sec | 8.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.40 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | On, off |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 198g (0.44 pounds) | 193g (0.43 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 61 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 260 photographs | 300 photographs |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $300 | $280 |