Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Samsung HZ35W
91 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 198g - 122 x 61 x 30mm
- Released February 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Revealed June 2010
- Other Name is WB650
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
Below is a thorough comparison of the Pentax WG-2 GPS and Samsung HZ35W, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Pentax and Samsung. There is a substantial difference between the resolutions of the WG-2 GPS (16MP) and HZ35W (12MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe WG-2 GPS was unveiled 21 months later than the HZ35W making them a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the WG-2 GPS scores vs the HZ35W in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS & Samsung HZ35W. The full galleries are provided at Pentax WG-2 GPS Gallery & Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-2 GPS over the Samsung HZ35W
| WG-2 GPS | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2012 |  | June 2010 | More recent by 21 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Pentax WG-2 GPS
| HZ35W | WG-2 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 614k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+154k dot) |
Common features in the Pentax WG-2 GPS and Samsung HZ35W
| WG-2 GPS | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lack of Touch display |
Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera often, you'll need to consider its weight and measurements. The Pentax WG-2 GPS comes with external measurements of 122mm x 61mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 198 grams (0.44 lbs) and the Samsung HZ35W has proportions of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check out the Pentax WG-2 GPS and Samsung HZ35W in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you use during that time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the WG-2 GPS compared to the HZ35W.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-2 GPS and HZ35W is 91 and 91 respectively.
Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Often, it's hard to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements merely by checking technical specs. The photograph below will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-2 GPS and HZ35W.
As you have seen, both cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Pentax WG-2 GPS to give extra detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics way more aggressively. The fresher WG-2 GPS is going to have an edge in sensor tech.
Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
| Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS | Samsung HZ35W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Pentax | Samsung |
| Model type | Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS | Samsung HZ35W |
| Also called as | - | WB650 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2012-02-07 | 2010-06-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460k dots | 614k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.40 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 198g (0.44 pounds) | 245g (0.54 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 61 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 260 photos | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $300 | $300 |