Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Sigma SD1
91 Imaging
38 Features
37 Overall
37
77 Imaging
54 Features
43 Overall
49
Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Sigma SD1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 198g - 122 x 61 x 30mm
- Introduced February 2012
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- n/ag - 146 x 113 x 80mm
- Announced September 2010
- Newer Model is Sigma SD1 Merrill
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Sigma SD1 Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Pentax WG-2 GPS and Sigma SD1, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by brands Pentax and Sigma. The sensor resolution of the WG-2 GPS (16MP) and the SD1 (15MP) is relatively close but the WG-2 GPS (1/2.3") and SD1 (APS-C) offer totally different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe WG-2 GPS was manufactured 17 months later than the SD1 which makes them a generation apart from one another. The two cameras feature different body design with the Pentax WG-2 GPS being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD1 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the WG-2 GPS grades vs the SD1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Sigma SD1 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS & Sigma SD1. The entire galleries are viewable at Pentax WG-2 GPS Gallery & Sigma SD1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-2 GPS over the Sigma SD1
| WG-2 GPS | SD1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2012 | September 2010 | More recent by 17 months |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD1 over the Pentax WG-2 GPS
| SD1 | WG-2 GPS |
|---|
Common features in the Pentax WG-2 GPS and Sigma SD1
| WG-2 GPS | SD1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More precise focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurement | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 460k | Exact same screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Sigma SD1 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera, you should consider its weight and measurements. The Pentax WG-2 GPS provides outside measurements of 122mm x 61mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 198 grams (0.44 lbs) while the Sigma SD1 has proportions of 146mm x 113mm x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Look at the Pentax WG-2 GPS and Sigma SD1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you use at that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the WG-2 GPS versus the SD1.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-2 GPS and SD1 is 91 and 77 respectively.
Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Sigma SD1 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its hard to envision the gap in sensor measurements purely by researching a spec sheet. The graphic below may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-2 GPS and SD1.
Clearly, both of those cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The WG-2 GPS featuring a smaller sensor will make shooting shallow DOF more difficult and the Pentax WG-2 GPS will render extra detail due to its extra 1MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots way more aggressively. The more recent WG-2 GPS will have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Sigma SD1 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Sigma SD1 Specifications
| Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS | Sigma SD1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Pentax | Sigma |
| Model | Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS | Sigma SD1 |
| Category | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
| Introduced | 2012-02-07 | 2010-09-21 |
| Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Dual True II |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 15 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4800 x 3200 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | - |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 11 |
| Cross focus points | - | 2 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 76 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 96% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 15s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.40 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 198 gr (0.44 lb) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 61 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 146 x 113 x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 260 images | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | Compact Flash (Type I, UDMA compatible) |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $300 | $2,339 |