Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Sony G3
91 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
94 Imaging
32 Features
30 Overall
31
Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Sony G3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 198g - 122 x 61 x 30mm
- Released February 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 185g - 97 x 59 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Sony G3 Overview
Here, we are reviewing the Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Sony G3, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Pentax and Sony. There is a significant difference among the resolutions of the WG-2 GPS (16MP) and G3 (10MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe WG-2 GPS was released 3 years after the G3 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a in-depth comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the WG-2 GPS scores versus the G3 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Sony G3 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-G3. The complete galleries are available at Pentax WG-2 GPS Gallery and Sony G3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-2 GPS over the Sony G3
| WG-2 GPS | G3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2012 | January 2009 | More modern by 38 months |
Reasons to pick Sony G3 over the Pentax WG-2 GPS
| G3 | WG-2 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3.5" | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 921k | 460k | Crisper display (+461k dot) | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Pentax WG-2 GPS and Sony G3
| WG-2 GPS | G3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Sony G3 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera, you're going to have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Pentax WG-2 GPS comes with physical dimensions of 122mm x 61mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 198 grams (0.44 lbs) while the Sony G3 has proportions of 97mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs).
Examine the Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Sony G3 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the WG-2 GPS against the G3.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the WG-2 GPS and G3 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Sony G3 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to visualize the gap in sensor sizes merely by researching specifications. The pic underneath will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-2 GPS and G3.
To sum up, both cameras come with the identical sensor size but different resolution. You should expect to see the Pentax WG-2 GPS to result in more detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The younger WG-2 GPS provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Sony G3 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Sony G3 Specifications
| Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-G3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Pentax | Sony |
| Model | Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-G3 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2012-02-07 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.5-10.0 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3.5" |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 921k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 1s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.40 m | 4.30 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 198g (0.44 pounds) | 185g (0.41 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 61 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 97 x 59 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 260 photographs | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $300 | $200 |