Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Sony HX300
91 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
63 Imaging
44 Features
51 Overall
46
Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Sony HX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 198g - 122 x 61 x 30mm
- Introduced February 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 623g - 130 x 103 x 93mm
- Revealed February 2013
- Succeeded the Sony HX200V
- Successor is Sony HX400V
Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Sony HX300 Overview
Here, we will be matching up the Pentax WG-2 GPS versus Sony HX300, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Pentax and Sony. The sensor resolution of the WG-2 GPS (16MP) and the HX300 (20MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras have the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe WG-2 GPS was brought out 12 months before the HX300 which means that they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Pentax WG-2 GPS being a Compact camera and the Sony HX300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting right into a full comparison, here is a brief summation of how the WG-2 GPS matches up vs the HX300 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Sony HX300 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300. The entire galleries are provided at Pentax WG-2 GPS Gallery & Sony HX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-2 GPS over the Sony HX300
WG-2 GPS | HX300 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX300 over the Pentax WG-2 GPS
HX300 | WG-2 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2013 | February 2012 | More modern by 12 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 460k | Crisper screen (+461k dot) |
Common features in the Pentax WG-2 GPS and Sony HX300
WG-2 GPS | HX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither includes Touch screen |
Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Sony HX300 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to think about its weight and proportions. The Pentax WG-2 GPS features outside dimensions of 122mm x 61mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 198 grams (0.44 lbs) and the Sony HX300 has measurements of 130mm x 103mm x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") and a weight of 623 grams (1.37 lbs).
See the Pentax WG-2 GPS versus Sony HX300 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are using at the time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the WG-2 GPS vs the HX300.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-2 GPS and HX300 is 91 and 63 respectively.
Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Sony HX300 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's tough to picture the difference between sensor sizes merely by looking at specifications. The pic here will give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-2 GPS and HX300.
To sum up, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You can expect the Sony HX300 to resolve greater detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures way more aggressively. The more aged WG-2 GPS is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Sony HX300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Sony HX300 Specifications
Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Pentax | Sony |
Model | Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 |
Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2012-02-07 | 2013-02-20 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5184 x 3888 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/2.8-6.3 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 921k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.40 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 198 gr (0.44 pounds) | 623 gr (1.37 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 61 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 130 x 103 x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 260 images | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | - |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $300 | $339 |