Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Sony T900
91 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 198g - 122 x 61 x 30mm
- Revealed February 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Revealed February 2009
Photography Glossary Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Sony T900 Overview
Here is a comprehensive overview of the Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Sony T900, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Ultracompact by companies Pentax and Sony. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the WG-2 GPS (16MP) and T900 (12MP) but they use the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe WG-2 GPS was brought out 3 years later than the T900 and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Pentax WG-2 GPS being a Compact camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting through a complete comparison, below is a short summation of how the WG-2 GPS grades vs the T900 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Sony T900 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The entire galleries are provided at Pentax WG-2 GPS Gallery & Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-2 GPS over the Sony T900
| WG-2 GPS | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2012 |  | February 2009 | Fresher by 37 months |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Pentax WG-2 GPS
| T900 | WG-2 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+462k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Pentax WG-2 GPS and Sony T900
| WG-2 GPS | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen |
Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to think about its weight and proportions. The Pentax WG-2 GPS has got external measurements of 122mm x 61mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 198 grams (0.44 lbs) while the Sony T900 has measurements of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") along with a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Check out the Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Sony T900 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you choose at the time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the WG-2 GPS versus the T900.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-2 GPS and T900 is 91 and 96 respectively.
Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its hard to visualize the gap between sensor sizing just by going over a spec sheet. The visual here may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-2 GPS and T900.
As you can see, each of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You can anticipate the Pentax WG-2 GPS to offer you greater detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos much more aggressively. The newer WG-2 GPS provides an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Sony T900 Specifications
| Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Pentax | Sony |
| Model type | Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
| Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2012-02-07 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.5-10.0 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 922k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 2 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.40 m | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 198 grams (0.44 lb) | 143 grams (0.32 lb) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 61 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 260 shots | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $300 | $300 |