Pentax WG-2 vs Samsung GX-10
91 Imaging
38 Features
37 Overall
37
59 Imaging
47 Features
43 Overall
45
Pentax WG-2 vs Samsung GX-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 122 x 61 x 30mm
- Launched February 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 793g - 142 x 101 x 70mm
- Launched September 2006
- Replacement is Samsung GX-20
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Pentax WG-2 vs Samsung GX-10 Overview
Let's look a little more in depth at the Pentax WG-2 vs Samsung GX-10, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Pentax and Samsung. There is a crucial difference among the image resolutions of the WG-2 (16MP) and GX-10 (10MP) and the WG-2 (1/2.3") and GX-10 (APS-C) feature totally different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe WG-2 was unveiled 5 years later than the GX-10 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Pentax WG-2 being a Compact camera and the Samsung GX-10 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving in to a complete comparison, below is a short summation of how the WG-2 matches up against the GX-10 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Pentax WG-2 vs Samsung GX-10 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Pentax Optio WG-2 and Samsung GX-10. The full galleries are viewable at Pentax WG-2 Gallery and Samsung GX-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-2 over the Samsung GX-10
| WG-2 | GX-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2012 | September 2006 | Fresher by 66 months | |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 210k | Clearer display (+250k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-10 over the Pentax WG-2
| GX-10 | WG-2 |
|---|
Common features in the Pentax WG-2 and Samsung GX-10
| WG-2 | GX-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Lack of Touch display |
Pentax WG-2 vs Samsung GX-10 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera often, you are going to need to consider its weight and volume. The Pentax WG-2 has got physical measurements of 122mm x 61mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs) and the Samsung GX-10 has sizing of 142mm x 101mm x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") and a weight of 793 grams (1.75 lbs).
Contrast the Pentax WG-2 vs Samsung GX-10 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the WG-2 against the GX-10.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-2 and GX-10 is 91 and 59 respectively.
Pentax WG-2 vs Samsung GX-10 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its hard to see the difference in sensor sizing just by checking out specifications. The visual below will help provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-2 and GX-10.
Plainly, each of the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The WG-2 using its smaller sensor will make getting shallower DOF harder and the Pentax WG-2 will provide extra detail having an extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images a little more aggressively. The younger WG-2 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Pentax WG-2 vs Samsung GX-10 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Pentax WG-2 vs Samsung GX-10 Specifications
| Pentax Optio WG-2 | Samsung GX-10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Pentax | Samsung |
| Model type | Pentax Optio WG-2 | Samsung GX-10 |
| Class | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
| Launched | 2012-02-07 | 2006-09-21 |
| Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Available lenses | - | 151 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 210 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.40 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 192g (0.42 lb) | 793g (1.75 lb) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 61 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 142 x 101 x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 260 shots | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $350 | $850 |