Pentax WG-2 vs Samsung SL202
91 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
94 Imaging
32 Features
17 Overall
26
Pentax WG-2 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 122 x 61 x 30mm
- Revealed February 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Launched February 2009
- Alternate Name is PL50
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Pentax WG-2 vs Samsung SL202 Overview
Below is a in-depth analysis of the Pentax WG-2 and Samsung SL202, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Pentax and Samsung. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the WG-2 (16MP) and SL202 (10MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe WG-2 was unveiled 3 years later than the SL202 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a complete comparison, here is a quick summation of how the WG-2 matches up against the SL202 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Pentax WG-2 vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Pentax Optio WG-2 & Samsung SL202. The full galleries are provided at Pentax WG-2 Gallery & Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-2 over the Samsung SL202
| WG-2 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2012 |  | February 2009 | More recent by 37 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Pentax WG-2
| SL202 | WG-2 |
|---|
Common features in the Pentax WG-2 and Samsung SL202
| WG-2 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Pentax WG-2 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Pentax WG-2 offers physical dimensions of 122mm x 61mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs) and the Samsung SL202 has dimensions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Examine the Pentax WG-2 and Samsung SL202 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing at that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the WG-2 versus the SL202.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the WG-2 and SL202 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Pentax WG-2 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very hard to visualise the gap in sensor measurements only by going through specs. The visual here may give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-2 and SL202.
All in all, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Pentax WG-2 to provide greater detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop pics more aggressively. The fresher WG-2 is going to have an edge in sensor technology.
Pentax WG-2 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Pentax WG-2 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
| Pentax Optio WG-2 | Samsung SL202 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Pentax | Samsung |
| Model type | Pentax Optio WG-2 | Samsung SL202 |
| Also called as | - | PL50 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2012-02-07 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.40 m | 4.60 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 192 grams (0.42 lb) | 168 grams (0.37 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 61 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 260 photos | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $350 | $140 |