Pentax WG-2 vs Samsung WB210
91 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
Pentax WG-2 vs Samsung WB210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 122 x 61 x 30mm
- Revealed February 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Boost to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Revealed July 2011
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Pentax WG-2 vs Samsung WB210 Overview
Here, we will be comparing the Pentax WG-2 and Samsung WB210, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Pentax and Samsung. The image resolution of the WG-2 (16MP) and the WB210 (14MP) is relatively close and both cameras offer the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe WG-2 was brought out 7 months later than the WB210 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a short summary of how the WG-2 grades against the WB210 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Pentax WG-2 vs Samsung WB210 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Pentax Optio WG-2 and Samsung WB210. The entire galleries are provided at Pentax WG-2 Gallery and Samsung WB210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-2 over the Samsung WB210
| WG-2 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2012 |  | July 2011 | Fresher by 7 months |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 1k | Clearer screen (+459k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Pentax WG-2
| WB210 | WG-2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Pentax WG-2 and Samsung WB210
| WG-2 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen |
Pentax WG-2 vs Samsung WB210 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to think about its weight and size. The Pentax WG-2 enjoys external measurements of 122mm x 61mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Samsung WB210 has specifications of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs).
See the Pentax WG-2 and Samsung WB210 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are using at the time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the WG-2 compared to the WB210.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-2 and WB210 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Pentax WG-2 vs Samsung WB210 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to picture the gap in sensor sizing simply by looking through specs. The photograph here may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-2 and WB210.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You should count on the Pentax WG-2 to provide you with more detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots way more aggressively. The more recent WG-2 should have a benefit in sensor tech.
Pentax WG-2 vs Samsung WB210 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Pentax WG-2 vs Samsung WB210 Specifications
| Pentax Optio WG-2 | Samsung WB210 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Pentax | Samsung |
| Model | Pentax Optio WG-2 | Samsung WB210 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2012-02-07 | 2011-07-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | - | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/2.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3.5 inches |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 1 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.40 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 192g (0.42 pounds) | 174g (0.38 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 61 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 260 shots | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | microSC/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $350 | $279 |